Storytelling in hand

As those attending this month’s FITC Mobile conference will find [...]

read
Why Orange?

Many people (ok, some people) (ok, some ART DIRECTOR people) [...]

read
The New Magazine?

In the four months since its release, the [...]

read
Things I have learned on this blog so far

Good news for the Grip blog and its readers: We [...]

read

Big Orange Slide

Friday, September 10th, 2010

As seen through an iPhone

March 30, 2010 by Ian Mackenzie

iPhone photo by Ian Mackenzie

It’s always nice to look out the north-facing windows at Grip.

The blue building on the left is the Art Gallery of Ontario, recently redesigned by Toronto-born architect Frank Ghery. You can’t really see it from this photo, but that gleaming silver extrusion is an exterior spiral staircase. This is the back of the building. The front resembles a post-modern glass pirate ship.

The white box on stilts at right is the Ontario College of Art and Design’s Sharp Centre for Design – completed in 2004 by British architect Will Alsop. I’ve heard there’s a bottleneck at the elevators that prevents good flow between the main OCAD building and the “tabletop.” Whatever. It looks cool.

On their own, each of these destination-architecture pieces helped to reinvigorate their organization’s brand. Together, they work hard to shape the story of the city that surrounds them.

What should we talk about now?

March 26, 2010 by Big Orange Slide

Illustration by Colin Craig

Visualizing transparency

March 25, 2010 by Patrick Robinson

Illustration by Colin Craig

Infographics – or “data visualization” as it’s also known – is the design discipline of translating large, complicated quantities of information into easily understood, illustrated graphs and images. It’s a burgeoning field that’s just received a big credibility boost from the President of the United States.

Earlier this month, Barack Obama appointed info-graphic design legend Edward Tufte to assist in providing “transparency in relation to the use of recovery related funds and to prevent and detect fraud, waste and mismanagement” for the Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board.

So, if you’ve been wondering what $787,000,000,000 in economic stimulus tax money looks like, here’s hoping Tufte brings his A-game. I’m guessing we’ll see his infographics at work in the quarterly report prepared for the President and Congress.

To see examples of Tufte’s work, check out one of his many books or his website.

Or to see a non-Tufte-designed infographic of the U.S. government’s financial bailout history, check this out.

And so continues the Obama marketing machine’s love affair with design. Shepard Fairey’s “HOPE” Obama campaign posters were the graphic design story of 2008. (I recently saw the original at the Smithsonian’s National Portrait Gallery. It’s as arresting as ever.)

Here’s hoping that graphic design can now play a role in the accountability and transparency of his government.

How to be social: Part 1.5 – How not to be social

March 24, 2010 by Jacoub Bondre

Illustration by Brian Ross

In Part 1 of this series I talked about what social media is and the basic rules for engaging your brand in it. Before moving on to Part 2, I’d like to talk about a recent example of what happens when you don’t follow the rules.

Last week the multinational packaged foods company Nestlé suffered what Marketing Magazine understatedly referred to as a social media “backlash:” Nestle Suffers Facebook Backlash.

It all started when the folks at Greenpeace released a video slamming Nestlé for its use of palm oil from endangered Indonesian forests: the punchline – Nestlé is killing orangutans to get you your chocolate.

But the Greenpeace video is just the start of this social media disaster:

“The PR headache moved to Facebook when Nestlé, in a fit of intellectual property protectionism, informed its 90,000 Facebook fans last night that: ‘We welcome your comments, but please don’t post using an altered version of any of our logos as your profile pic–they will be deleted,’” wrote Marketing Magazine’s Emily Bryson and Kunur Patel.

In Part 1 of this series on social media, I introduce Rule #2: “Trust your stewards.” When Nestlé noticed that some users were using modified and unflattering logos as commentary on their policies, they should have either ignored it or embraced it (Rule #3 “Be Agile”).

A simple comment from Nestlé such as, “We welcome all of our customer’s opinions regardless of form. Please be assured that we are currently and constantly improving our sustainability practices,” would have gone a long way to averting the impending PR disaster, or even better, owning it and turning it into an opportunity to improve their brand’s image.

Instead Nestlé went a different route. And then it got worse when one of Nestlé’s brand stewards tried to communicate the error of their response.

“[Nestlé Facebook fan] Paul Griffin offered that he’s ‘not sure you’re going to win friends in the social media space with this sort of dogmatic approach. I understand that you’re on your back-foot due to various issues not excluding palm oil but social media is about embracing your market, engaging and having a conversation rather than preaching!’

“The Nestlé moderator’s response: ‘Thanks for the lesson in manners. Consider yourself embraced. But it’s our page, we set the rules, it was ever thus.’” With that statement they instantly turned 90,000 potential brand defenders into, in the best case scenario, simple observers, and in the worst case, brand detractors.

“Social media is a way for two people to share ideas,” says Chris Saad, VP strategy for Echo, “typically in a public or semi-public space where others can watch.”

“Think of social media as if it were a business dinner party,” he says. “Think of your brand stewards as your friends at the party, and your audience is the balance of the guests at the party. You carry on conversations with your friends, but are happy to include other guests into the conversation. The point is to get ‘brands’ out of the mix and make it about authentic human interactions . . . cut the BS and make an honest connection.”

The honesty, candour and tone of the kinds of conversations you have with your friends and colleagues should be the same as those you have with your customers in the social space.

Though the Nestlé PR storm was caused by a number of factors, none was so glaring as this:

Nestlé believed that they controlled the narrative of their brand online and in the social space. But social media is not a print ad, nor a TV commercial, nor a banner ad. Social Media is a multidirectional conversation between the brand and the many. The many control your brand narrative, so be nice to them, and keep the conversation going.

You can see the ongoing aftermath of Nestle’s social media disaster live on its Facebook fan page, here. And to be fair to Nestlé, and as a marketer who works on all kinds of brands, I empathize with how wrong this went so quickly. We’d all do well to learn lessons from it.

Rebranding blogs

March 23, 2010 by Ian Mackenzie

Illustration by Brian Ross

Some recent thoughts on “rebranding” from the marketing blogs:

The Next Stage
“Theatre.” If the word puts you in mind of excruciating boredom and happy/sad drama masks you’re probably in the majority. So argues Vancouver theatre marketer and blogger Simon Ogden in his recent Rebranding of theatre post. “ . . . to get these creaky images out of the minds of the general public, we are going to have to re-brand.” It’s his call to arms for a new generation of theatre makers and marketers. The goal: “Establish a common consciousness about how our art form is thought of by those that aren’t . . . well, us, and convince them it’s not that thing that they’re thinking it is.” Great idea.

Dollar Rede$ign Project
Speaking of niche blogging, here’s an entire blog devoted to the rebranding of US money – both figuratively and literally. “The Dollar ReDe$ign Project hopes to bring about change for everyone. We want to rebrand the US Dollar, rebuild financial confidence and revive our failing economy.” See the double meaning of the word “change” there?

City of Toronto web re:Brand blog
It’s awesome that the City of Toronto is embracing blogging, but its “City of Toronto web re:Brand blog” is so far more confusing than clarifying. It’s a blog “about toronto.ca and the web re:Brand project.” So, it’s a blog about a website and a separate “re:Branding” project? I’m lost.

Rebrand Tasmania
The Australian island state of Tasmania wants to be known for more than that insane cartoon spinning devil guy. To that end, some savvy marketing folks down there have started the “Rebrand Tasmania” blog: “We started this project because as proud Tasmanians, we felt the current State Government brand failed to capture the unique sense of environment, heritage and culture that Tasmania has to offer.” They’ve put their first 3-minute pitch video on their site. Here it is:

How to be social: Part 1 – Diving in

March 18, 2010 by Jacoub Bondre

Illustration by Brian RossJacoub Bondre on getting started in social media, five rules to live by, and the good old-fashioned power of brand stewards.


There’s a lot of smart thinking going on in the social media marketing space these days. One needs only look as far as their local Facebook page, Twitter feed, or favourite blogs to see social media marketing hard at work. But there’s also tremendous opportunity to improve our understanding of what social media is, and what opportunities may lie in its heart.

I’d like to start this series on social media by reviewing exactly what “social media” is. So . . . here goes:

In its most basic terms, social media is any media that allows conversations to take place between multiple parties. That is: brand-to-consumer, consumer-to-brand, and consumer-to-consumer.

Let’s break down a basic social media interaction from a brand to a consumer.

Brand: Here is a message or an idea about our product or service.

Consumer 1: Cool! This message is awesome. Hey Consumer 2, have you seen this?

Consumer 2: News to me – and it’s interesting. I should pass this along to my friends.

Now, I don’t know about you, but this seems an awful lot like good old-fashioned brand stewardship.

Your Uncle Bob
Everyone has an aunt/uncle, cousin, brother, friend, or other family member that is fanatical about a brand. My mother, for example, loves Hyundai. Any chance she gets she tries to convince her friends and family to buy one. When any of us point out something we don’t like about the brand, she adamantly defends it.

This is the basic behaviour of a brand steward. Not all are as dedicated as my mother, but you can see this behaviour to varying degrees in everyone you know. And why not? It’s basic human nature to identify with a group, and to want to be a part of it. In the case of my mom, it’s Hyundai drivers. Some people don’t associate with brand groups, but with other interests. Take your Uncle Bob who loves horses. And because he loves horses, he loves everyone who loves horses.

Bob online
Social media is, at its heart, a new venue for communicating with and harnessing the power of brand stewards. I know that sounds easy, but it’s not – and there are rules. As our own Dave Hamilton writes: “Because in this new and powerful channel, brands are no longer sponsors underwriting the cost of programming. They are fellow citizens and they’re expected to behave and conduct themselves accordingly.”

The rules of engagement:

Rule 1: Accept all customer feedback.
There are some realities that a brand needs to deal with before they venture into the world of social media. First and most profound of these is that the brand CAN NOT control the discourse in the social media realm, no more than they can control the conversation around my mother’s dining room table when it turns to cars. As soon as you create a Twitter account, a Facebook page, or even just start allowing comments on your site, you must acknowledge that not all conversations will go exactly as you want them to go.

Rule 2: Trust your stewards.
There is a group of people on the Internet known ominously as “Trolls.” Trolls like nothing more than to wait for an opportunity to upset either an individual or brand by pouncing on a conversation with negative comments, whether or not those comments have any basis in truth. Trolls are not as big of a problem for brands as you might think. Trolls do not care about the brands they attack – but stewards do. Your brand stewards will seek out the brands they love and will be eager to participate. They will also be the first to put Trolls in their place, and the first to defend the brand. Under no circumstances should a brand attempt to censor or moderate an active conversation. Immediately, it is seen as if the brand has something to hide. It is seen as disingenuous and will be seen negatively even by the brand’s stewards. For example:

Brand – Brio is on sale!
Troll – I hate Brio, it tastes like old pennies . . . boo Brio!
Steward – Dude Brio rocks, what are you on?
Steward 2 – If you don’t like Brio, why are you on the Brio fan page, you Troll.
Steward 3 – Ya, go back under your bridge *enjoying a Brio while I’m typing this*.

The protecting power of your brand stewards is often overlooked by brands who are hesitant to embark on their social media journeys. A negative comment that’s refuted by brand stewards often has more benefit to how that brand is seen in the social space than a brand that never experiences a negative comment.

Rule 3: Be clever and agile.
Every once in a while, the brand will do or say something that everyone disagrees with. Even the brand stewards will dislike a direction, decision, or comment made. This is not the time to panic, or even to back-pedal. This is the time to be agile and clever. Quickly identify what it is your consumer base is unsatisfied with and fix it. I know sometimes that’s easier said than done, but when done well and quickly, the results can be positive overall.

A recent example comes from Virgin Mobile on the consumer-watch show “Marketplace.” Virgin Mobile Canada was recently rated as having one of Canada’s worst cellphone plans. The situation involved a dispute between the company and customers over charges. After several months Virgin turned out to be at fault, but during that time it cost the customer significant time and money. From the time Virgin’s upper level staff were informed to the time the episode of Marketplace aired, Virgin had made a simple, yet widespread policy change: From that point forward the customer was right until proven otherwise. Any disputed charges would be removed from the customer’s bill immediately, only to be returned should, at the end of an investigation, the customer is proven to be wrong.

In the end, my perception of Virgin Mobile is one of a company that listens to customers, admits mistakes, and takes responsibility. This is not the first time, nor will it be the last that Virgin turns negatives into positives.

The point is, if you are doing something your customers really don’t like, change it, communicate it, and your reputation will be stronger for it. The social realm is the ideal place for these types of agile customer transactions to happen. But the key to success is to be honest.

Toyota is currently trying to use Digg to assure customers that they have a fix for the issues that ail their cars. The problem is that they have been caught lying about the extent and severity of the problems. So right beside a Digg article about “How Toyota is Fixing the Problem” is an article about the US government investigating Toyota over consumer protection fraud. A disastrous combination.

Rule 4: Be genuine.
The most successful brands in the social space have two-way conversations with their customers. They allow their employees, or the agency that facilitates their conversations, to interact with customers, to go beyond the initial communication.

For example, a brand will post a question:

Brand: What did you think of last night’s game?
Customer1: It was awesome.
Customer2: Ya, but Crosby seemed off.
Brand: Crosby really has to step up his game.

Especially now, in a political climate of populism, it is incredibly important for your customers to see you as a collective of people, rather than just faceless corporations. The above discourse illustrates a human connection behind the conversations.

Adobe does a great job of this. Adobe has several “Brand Evangelists.” These are long-term Adobe employees, that have intimate knowledge of the brand and the business behind the brand. They also believe in the brand. These evangelists are now paid to run blogs, comment on other people’s blogs, tweet stuff and go to conferences. These evangelists also have power to influence the company to a certain extent. The feedback that the evangelists collect in their travels makes it back to the decision makers in the company. This allows Adobe to be agile in delivering consistent solutions for their customers when they launch new projects.

Rule 5: Be brave.
The benefits of entering the social space far outweigh the pitfalls. Brands should not check the water with their toes first (so to speak), but rather jump right in. Social media is not the type of environment where participating half way will result in much benefit at all.

Conclusion
In this post, I talked about the basics of what social media is, and the basic rules for engaging in that space. It’s a new and powerful venue for brand stewardship. In the posts to come, I’ll delve deeper into trends and opportunities – and social media beyond the web.

Grip interviews: Andy Slater

March 17, 2010 by Dave Hamilton

Andy Slater

Andy Slater is a Designer at Grip Limited.


1) How long have you been designing these awesome posters?
I’ve been into poster design since high school, but the F’UNREAL posters are about two years old.

2) How did it start? What’s your connection to the music scene?
I started really getting into poster during my stint as designer for the Drake Hotel. The music promotion was a treat.

F’UNREAL is a monthly event at The Boat in Toronto’s Kensington Market. It’s the by-product of four guys and house parties that took their toll. Throwing a party at a venue started as a joke (and don’t get me wrong, it’s still very much is a joke), but the first one sold out, and now we’ve sold out almost 24 in a row.

A few of us have also branched out into other nights around the city. It seemed to have come together at the right time. We were all generally tired of what was going in the “scene.”

Funreal_2

3) What influences or stimuli do you find making their way into these posters?
Music, friends, laughing, hand-claps, good times, naps, dogs, grilled cheese, my grandma, Larry David, Back to the Future, Tom Jones, ice cream – anything and everything influences me. It’s important as a designer to take in as much as you possibly can. A major influence would be design from the past, mainly 1950s to ’80s.

I often think I was born in the wrong decade.

4) These posters are 180 degrees from the work you do at Grip; do the two streams connect in any way?
Nope, and that’s how I like it. Personal work is important, it’s great exercise, plus it’s nice to be your only client.

Funreal_3

5) What are you listening to these days?
Stevie Wonder – Music of My Mind
Beach Boys – Pet Sounds
Mr. Bungle – California
Marvin Gaye – Love Starved Heart
Boards of Canada – The Campfire Headphase
Ennio Morricone – For a Few Dollars More

6) Does music influence your work?
Absolutely. Music has dictated most of my journey through life thus far. I wouldn’t be here without concert posters/album artwork.

7) What’s bigger, your passion for music or for design?
Both aspects of my life complement each other so well. They have integrated themselves into being such a major part of who I am that it’s almost impossible to pick one over the other. That being said, I am a fan of music, but design is what’s covered in my blood, sweat and tears. For that reason, I’ll go with design.

funreal_1

8) What’s your dream job?
This might be the hardest question anyone has ever asked me. How does one even answer such a question? Do I answer with the realistic dream of owning and operating my own design company? Or do I tell you I want to be Tom Jones circa 1970?

Let’s go with Tom Jones.


You can catch Andy and the F’UNREAL folks at their next event: March 26 at The Boat in Kensington Market, Toronto.

What’s the last piece of communication you can honestly say “closed the sale” for you?

March 16, 2010 by Big Orange Slide

Add your comment below

I’m a Mac

March 12, 2010 by Randy Stein

Photo by Randy Stein

A snapshot from Grip’s IT department – allaying fears that our Mac-based environment may be flirting with the dark side.

So, what are your customers saying about your brand?

Rebranding Canada

March 11, 2010 by Curtis Westman

Illustration by Haley Fiege

Look, Canada, I know you’ve always said that you’re comfortable with your agency of record, and who wouldn’t be?

You’ve had a good run of it so far: 143 years. The company is strong. Your consumers are some of the happiest in the world. And they stick with the company lifestyle on average almost three years longer than their U.S. counterparts (even longer for your female employees). But let’s face it—your brand is in trouble. You’ve cut out several of your more notable pro bono initiatives. Your federal politicians are featured unfavorably in the news more than fashionista celebutants like Adam Giambrone. Even the weather seems to be conspiring against you.

Canada, it’s time for a change.

First things first, we have to deal with your jingle. Focus groups have reported a decline in consumer satisfaction with the song’s gender-specific language, and I think these numbers indicate that you’re in for a rude awakening.

You adopted the jingle in 1913—and in those days your target demographic was totally different. Back then, you were appealing to the idealistic all-thy-sons-in-top-hats segment (and I always thought your target was too narrow); but your target audience has shifted during these past 100 years. Recent Forrester, Inc. reports are showing that you’re sitting on a heavy 51% females-without-top-hats market. They’re growing bored and disinterested because your jingle doesn’t even mention them.

Also, and I’m going to have to be honest with you about this—the very idea of the jingle is out. “O Canada” was great 20 years ago. But this is the 21st Century. It’s time to follow the trends, license some popular music and leverage it against your brand. There’s a young Canadian musician just starting his career, and I think he’d be perfect. His name is Stephen Harper. He has a day job, of course, but that’s alright because I hear he can take time off whenever he feels like it.

Let’s talk about your visual brand identity. Most important, the red maple leaf logo. It’s flat. It’s boring. This is the digital age of advertising, and your brand-mark is like print media: obsolete. Frankly Canada, and I’m only trying to help, you need to update your look. Leaves are history; when’s the last time your consumers saw a living tree? Why not incorporate something contemporary and relevant to Canada, like a car, or a spaceship, or a perpetual motion machine, or the Stanley Cup?

Actually, never mind that last one.

I also think it’s time you went the extra step and tried something groundbreaking. Have you thought about viral marketing? The U.S. had a great campaign with their “Weapons of Mass Destruction” ARG (alternate reality game), and look at the publicity it garnered them. Everybody’s still talking about it, even seven years later.

You’ve made some progress on the world stage in recent weeks, and I think this is the perfect time to unleash a new brand image. If you entrusted your business to me, I’d update your logo, I’d update your music, and I’d even update all of your celebrities with younger counterparts.

I’ve already replaced William Shatner with Chris Pine, and Leonard Cohen with K.D. Lang, and most people didn’t even notice.

I’ve developed a full 216-paged proposal for your company’s new identity. Let me know if you want to read it whenever you’re done cleaning up Vancouver.

And Canada, remember above all else that people are looking for a positive attitude. Have a look at the slogan I’ve developed for you: “It’s not ‘Canada’; it’s just ‘Can.’”