Jacoub Bondre on getting started in social media, five rules to live by, and the good old-fashioned power of brand stewards.
There’s a lot of smart thinking going on in the social media marketing space these days. One needs only look as far as their local Facebook page, Twitter feed, or favourite blogs to see social media marketing hard at work. But there’s also tremendous opportunity to improve our understanding of what social media is, and what opportunities may lie in its heart.
I’d like to start this series on social media by reviewing exactly what “social media” is. So . . . here goes:In its most basic terms, social media is any media that allows conversations to take place between multiple parties. That is: brand-to-consumer, consumer-to-brand, and consumer-to-consumer.
Let’s break down a basic social media interaction from a brand to a consumer.
Brand: Here is a message or an idea about our product or service.
Consumer 1: Cool! This message is awesome. Hey Consumer 2, have you seen this?
Consumer 2: News to me – and it’s interesting. I should pass this along to my friends.
Now, I don’t know about you, but this seems an awful lot like good old-fashioned brand stewardship.
Your Uncle Bob
Everyone has an aunt/uncle, cousin, brother, friend, or other family member that is fanatical about a brand. My mother, for example, loves Hyundai. Any chance she gets she tries to convince her friends and family to buy one. When any of us point out something we don’t like about the brand, she adamantly defends it.
This is the basic behaviour of a brand steward. Not all are as dedicated as my mother, but you can see this behaviour to varying degrees in everyone you know. And why not? It’s basic human nature to identify with a group, and to want to be a part of it. In the case of my mom, it’s Hyundai drivers. Some people don’t associate with brand groups, but with other interests. Take your Uncle Bob who loves horses. And because he loves horses, he loves everyone who loves horses.
Bob online
Social media is, at its heart, a new venue for communicating with and harnessing the power of brand stewards. I know that sounds easy, but it’s not – and there are rules. As our own Dave Hamilton writes: “Because in this new and powerful channel, brands are no longer sponsors underwriting the cost of programming. They are fellow citizens and they’re expected to behave and conduct themselves accordingly.”
The rules of engagement:
Rule 1: Accept all customer feedback.
There are some realities that a brand needs to deal with before they venture into the world of social media. First and most profound of these is that the brand CAN NOT control the discourse in the social media realm, no more than they can control the conversation around my mother’s dining room table when it turns to cars. As soon as you create a Twitter account, a Facebook page, or even just start allowing comments on your site, you must acknowledge that not all conversations will go exactly as you want them to go.
Rule 2: Trust your stewards.
There is a group of people on the Internet known ominously as “Trolls.” Trolls like nothing more than to wait for an opportunity to upset either an individual or brand by pouncing on a conversation with negative comments, whether or not those comments have any basis in truth. Trolls are not as big of a problem for brands as you might think. Trolls do not care about the brands they attack – but stewards do. Your brand stewards will seek out the brands they love and will be eager to participate. They will also be the first to put Trolls in their place, and the first to defend the brand. Under no circumstances should a brand attempt to censor or moderate an active conversation. Immediately, it is seen as if the brand has something to hide. It is seen as disingenuous and will be seen negatively even by the brand’s stewards. For example:
Brand – Brio is on sale!
Troll – I hate Brio, it tastes like old pennies . . . boo Brio!
Steward – Dude Brio rocks, what are you on?
Steward 2 – If you don’t like Brio, why are you on the Brio fan page, you Troll.
Steward 3 – Ya, go back under your bridge *enjoying a Brio while I’m typing this*.
The protecting power of your brand stewards is often overlooked by brands who are hesitant to embark on their social media journeys. A negative comment that’s refuted by brand stewards often has more benefit to how that brand is seen in the social space than a brand that never experiences a negative comment.
Rule 3: Be clever and agile.
Every once in a while, the brand will do or say something that everyone disagrees with. Even the brand stewards will dislike a direction, decision, or comment made. This is not the time to panic, or even to back-pedal. This is the time to be agile and clever. Quickly identify what it is your consumer base is unsatisfied with and fix it. I know sometimes that’s easier said than done, but when done well and quickly, the results can be positive overall.
A recent example comes from Virgin Mobile on the consumer-watch show “Marketplace.” Virgin Mobile Canada was recently rated as having one of Canada’s worst cellphone plans. The situation involved a dispute between the company and customers over charges. After several months Virgin turned out to be at fault, but during that time it cost the customer significant time and money. From the time Virgin’s upper level staff were informed to the time the episode of Marketplace aired, Virgin had made a simple, yet widespread policy change: From that point forward the customer was right until proven otherwise. Any disputed charges would be removed from the customer’s bill immediately, only to be returned should, at the end of an investigation, the customer is proven to be wrong.
In the end, my perception of Virgin Mobile is one of a company that listens to customers, admits mistakes, and takes responsibility. This is not the first time, nor will it be the last that Virgin turns negatives into positives.
The point is, if you are doing something your customers really don’t like, change it, communicate it, and your reputation will be stronger for it. The social realm is the ideal place for these types of agile customer transactions to happen. But the key to success is to be honest.
Toyota is currently trying to use Digg to assure customers that they have a fix for the issues that ail their cars. The problem is that they have been caught lying about the extent and severity of the problems. So right beside a Digg article about “How Toyota is Fixing the Problem” is an article about the US government investigating Toyota over consumer protection fraud. A disastrous combination.
Rule 4: Be genuine.
The most successful brands in the social space have two-way conversations with their customers. They allow their employees, or the agency that facilitates their conversations, to interact with customers, to go beyond the initial communication.
For example, a brand will post a question:
Brand: What did you think of last night’s game?
Customer1: It was awesome.
Customer2: Ya, but Crosby seemed off.
Brand: Crosby really has to step up his game.
Especially now, in a political climate of populism, it is incredibly important for your customers to see you as a collective of people, rather than just faceless corporations. The above discourse illustrates a human connection behind the conversations.
Adobe does a great job of this. Adobe has several “Brand Evangelists.” These are long-term Adobe employees, that have intimate knowledge of the brand and the business behind the brand. They also believe in the brand. These evangelists are now paid to run blogs, comment on other people’s blogs, tweet stuff and go to conferences. These evangelists also have power to influence the company to a certain extent. The feedback that the evangelists collect in their travels makes it back to the decision makers in the company. This allows Adobe to be agile in delivering consistent solutions for their customers when they launch new projects.
Rule 5: Be brave.
The benefits of entering the social space far outweigh the pitfalls. Brands should not check the water with their toes first (so to speak), but rather jump right in. Social media is not the type of environment where participating half way will result in much benefit at all.
Conclusion
In this post, I talked about the basics of what social media is, and the basic rules for engaging in that space. It’s a new and powerful venue for brand stewardship. In the posts to come, I’ll delve deeper into trends and opportunities – and social media beyond the web.
Food for thought: The spy who sold out

Forgiving a pretty face
Facebook to agencies: how will people share your story?
Is “The Pitch” an accurate reflection of our industry?










Curtis Westman
March 18, 2010 @ 12:18 pm
An interesting quality of some brand stewards is sometimes just how vehemently they can defend their chosen brand. One of the more obvious (and often vitriolic) battles of the brands has been going on for almost three decades: console video gaming.
In the mid- to late-’80s, it was Nintendo vs. Sega, and the brands probably facilitated the competition. “Sega does what Nintendon’t” became an divisive advertising slogan, and suddenly kids were arguing on the playground about which platform was better. Obviously, they became brand stewards at that age not because of any in-depth consumer research — they were followers of the brand that their parents chose for them, and since they couldn’t buy anything else with their own money, they furiously defended the only one they had.
But these kids have grown up, and the video gaming culture has expanded to three major franchises. Nowadays, the same people that argued for or against those burgeoning manufacturers in the schoolyard are arguing for and against Sony, Microsoft and (again) Nintendo on the Internet. The strange part is that these days, they have jobs and could afford to buy all three if they really wanted to. And yet online message boards are full of spit and vinegar, full of brand stewards eager to see their competitors fail, willing to fight it out until the bitter end.
It’s like they’ve given Mac and PC anti-personnel weapons and a virtual battlefield. Not brand stewards, perhaps, but brand warriors.
Also, Brio is awesome and anyone who says otherwise will taste my wrath.
Sid32
March 18, 2010 @ 4:59 pm
Great advice for large corps. But what would you advise smaller brands that can’t afford full time “Brand Evangelists,” or brands that have had their brand hijacked? See Pabst Blue Ribbion, FUBU, etc..
Jacoub Bondre
March 19, 2010 @ 8:12 am
Thx for the comment Sid32. For smaller brands the rules are pretty much the same. You don’t need a brand evangelist to have and grow a dedicated following of stewards. ColdFx is a perfect example of this. They do an amazing job of having genuine conversations with their followers. In this case it is a few employees that take the time to engage with their audience on a regular basis.
As far as brand who have been hi-jacked. Well thats an article on its own. Stay tuned ;)
Ean Bowman
March 19, 2010 @ 10:06 am
@Curtis Westman
I typically found the video game culture’s brand stewards to be a bit tiresome, and I still do.
That doesn’t change their effectiveness, however. You see camps literally at war with one another, as you say.
My good friend, for example, can’t wait to see Sony go down.
ameet
March 19, 2010 @ 3:56 pm
example below..
http://www.marketingmag.ca/english/news/pr/article.jsp?content=20100319_150530_10900
Jim Monteath
March 19, 2010 @ 6:48 pm
@Jacoub The Adobe citation is interesting. I’ve encountered three Adobe “Brand Evangelists” through their blogs & some Twitter posts and came away with a mixed opinion of their social media behaviour.
The first two are in product management/marketing: John Nack (mostly Creative Suite products) and John Dowdell (Flash). While they are certainly “genuine” (they don’t pretend to be something they are not) they constantly violate Rules 1&2 in their blogs. Both disparage any criticism and Dowdell proudly refuses to publish critical comments at all. Their blogs are one-sided, defensive “echo chambers”. I think that makes their brand look weak and it’s certainly not very social.
On the positive side, there’s Senior Engineering Manager Eric Wilde (installation & licensing for Creative Suite). This blog is targeted at people who have to install and manage Adobe CS products on many computers over long periods of time. Let me assure you that this is a large, chronic pain for those of us who manage IT. The blog was created by Adobe in response to a groundswell of public and vocal anger (Rule 3). I commend Adobe for doing so and applaud Wilde for doing an outstanding job in managing that communication channel with an often hostile audience.
@Ameet Ouch!
siv
March 21, 2010 @ 2:24 am
Thanks a lot Jake, that was really well-written. Especially when brands are sponsoring events, they have to be a part of all the conversations that people have.
For example, we have the Indian Premier League (IPL) cricket cup till April. And one brand that’s made the best use of IPL is Vodafone India, which created lovable characters called the ZooZoos. People saw the really funny ads, like (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=__IxW6Vy8PA) and literally worshipped them on Facebook, Orkut and Twitter.
It made me think that when brands use social media really well, they get talked about in REAL LIFE INTERACTIONS too.
It’s like being in love: as a brand, you have to keep discovering newer and newer ways to spice up your customer conversations.
Ian Mackenzie
March 23, 2010 @ 4:36 pm
For anyone keeping track, this was Big Orange Slide’s 100th post.
John Dowdell
March 23, 2010 @ 11:13 pm
Howdy, if you’ll check the record you’ll see I do publish critical comments on my own weblog, most often when they actually advance the discussion. But pseudonymous off-topic stuff, it’s getcher-own-blog territory. ;-)
btw, there’s tons of Adobe employees blogging, tweeting, commenting, and user-foruming. They all have meaningful Google footprints too.
jd/adobe
Jacoub Bondre
March 24, 2010 @ 11:49 am
We love you John :D
Jim Monteath
March 24, 2010 @ 7:20 pm
@John Dowdell My opinions were formed by reading your blog for several months, having read what other people think about it (always good to get other input) & experimenting (once) by posting a comment that was critical, on-topic, not profane, not a logical fallacy and yet it wasn’t published.
I agree that others should “check the record” and form their own opinions by doing similar research. Your November 2009 archive contains good examples of you pre-empting criticism with warnings, dismissing criticism with snark and in one case disallowing comments on a particularly contentious article.
By the way, some of your articles appear to be intentionally provocative, just for the sake of stirring up controversy: it’s no wonder you attract criticism on those.
It’s your/Adobe’s blog and it’s your right to run it how you want. However, I consider it a poor exemplar of Jacoub’s Rules of Engagement.
Hooy
March 25, 2010 @ 12:58 pm
Great article, Jacoub. Can’t wait for Part 2…