Proofreading at an advertising agency is a lot like re-enacting the civil war with live ammunition. We’re among friends: we’ve watched each other marry and have children, and together we’ve experienced some of our most memorable times. Regardless, we can’t ignore the sinking feeling that one day we’ll kill each other. Thus, in case the worst should happen, consider this my final memoir.
Writing this is hard for me, you must understand, just as it is hard for anyone to boil down their craft into the thick balsamic reduction of a blog entry. At the beginning of my journey so many years ago, I pulled my red pen from the sacred stone and took up arms against typographic demons much for the same reasons other proofreaders do, not for this obvious fame and wealth, but rather for the love of the hunt itself. But the public is a ravenous, bloodthirsty mistress, and she wants to read about the dangers of proofreading.
You see, there’s a tremendous back-and-forth between proofreaders and studio artists, and proofreaders and producers, and proofreaders and art directors, and proofreaders and proofreaders. Really, we’re everyone’s worst nightmare, because no matter what we do, we’ve already made an enemy. A proof with too many mark-ups causes headaches because it delays production and affects the client’s bottom line. One with too few mark-ups causes headaches because everything has gone to hell and our superiors have to argue about whether or not waterboarding us would be in violation of the Geneva Convention.
Ultimately, it’s less painful to err on the side of caution.
That doesn’t make it easier. Ask any normal person what an advertisement is made of and they might give the obvious answer: black ink, aged moon dust and four glorious colours of powdered and rendered unicorn. But to a proofreader, those basic ingredients form complex elements to be examined. We see copy, images, a headline, and a line of legal so long that few have reached its end without descending into madness. Some say you’d have to be mad to try.
These complicated ads are a proofreader’s bread and butter. When we’re not toasting and eating them, we’re meticulously filtering out spelling and grammatical errors, checking sizes and bleeds and signing document after document in search of the fabled “perfect proof.” If we could stare at the same half-page ad all day, every day for weeks, poring over each character of every word and each pixel of every image until we were certain that there could not possibly be anything wrong with it, we would. But very few agencies are willing to hire a live-in proofreader. And those that are willing don’t have very comfortable beds.
So, eventually, we have to admit that even for divinely appointed proofreaders, perfection is unattainable, and we must hand off the ad for approval. We’ve done what we can to please the client, flirted with perfection and rode the razor’s edge between man-like passion and machine-like precision.
But we must beware; all is not well, because from that point on, we are stained with it. Like Lady Macbeth, nothing will cleanse us of what we have seen and done. Errors will occasionally happen. And we are responsible.
Short of ritual suicide, there really is nothing we can do to pay penance. As tempting as hemlock might be, the best we can do is learn from our mistakes and ensure they never happen again. We’ll continue in this way until, inevitably, we will learn everything there is to know about everything, and then we’ll simply disappear into a cloud of particulate matter that nobody really feels comfortable inhaling.
It’s a long journey, a trial-by-fire, but that is the nature of proofreading — the art of tracking and trapping and executing errors. Some people say they’ve never seen an error in the wild; others argue that they may not even exist. Trust me, my friends, the errors are out there. I’ve seen them. Waiting.
And we can’t let the errors win.
Buying into plotlines

Your brand is your user experience
Merry Amex-mas (Augmented Fun From Down Un)
Where do you stand on SOPA and PIPA?











Leilah Ambrose
August 4, 2010 @ 3:25 pm
This is a reallly great article Curtis; I’m on bored with proofreaders’ helping the work along. After all, God is in the detales.
Tweets that mention The enemy in the ad « Big Orange Slide -- Topsy.com
August 4, 2010 @ 4:10 pm
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Applied Arts and Grip Limited, miranda. miranda said: Today on the #BigOrangeSlide: The enemy in the ad by Curtis Westman http://bit.ly/bbJiI1 #proofreading #advertising [...]
Michelle Davey
August 4, 2010 @ 4:48 pm
Excellent Article Curtis! As a Studio artist I always know what I get back from you will be mistake free, and although sometimes there might be a lot of red markups that I don’t want to necessarily change cause it won’t fit or changes my line breaks, I know they always make the ads better!!! Keep up the great work proofreading and writing articles!
Jacoub Bondre
August 4, 2010 @ 6:16 pm
Brilliantly written! AND no gramaticle airers.
Adam Gordon
August 4, 2010 @ 6:53 pm
I like Jacoub’s comment mainly because I read this entire post at least 3 times trying to find an ironic mistake. Very nice article.
Ean Bowman
August 4, 2010 @ 7:23 pm
I loathe a few regular offenders and see them far too often.
Plurals with apostrophe-s endings are a big one. Homophone confusion amongst adults is another. :)
That’s just my anal-retentive nature speaking, though. Obviously, many don’t feel the same.
It brings to mind that interesting study where it was found if you mixed up every letter but the first and last of each word it is understood easily and perfectly by most people.
Sarah
August 4, 2010 @ 8:49 pm
Marvelous!
Ameet
August 4, 2010 @ 8:56 pm
Wicked article man.. say.. you wanna write my next blog post?
Harvey Carroll
August 5, 2010 @ 3:07 pm
Great article!
Ahmed M. Dirie
August 6, 2010 @ 12:52 pm
This was one of the most interesting pieces I have read. The image of the explosives initially caught my attention, followed by an explosive introduction. I couldn’t help but laugh at your mention of memorable times and the sinking feeling you all share. Pointlessly armed with a red pen, I enjoyed the rest of it.
Kathere
August 10, 2010 @ 11:44 pm
Very well written!
A Moment of Self-Reflection - Bunch of Ice Productions
October 24, 2010 @ 12:58 pm
[...] The enemy in the ad [...]
= ) KK
January 14, 2011 @ 12:09 pm
You should have written “ridden” instead of rode, because the parallelism is “have done/(have)flirted/(have)ridden.
Bummer man. Where’s my 4 hours’ freelance invoice…
Curtis Westman
March 14, 2011 @ 10:44 am
Alas! Like Polkaroo, the “perfect proof” eludes us once again.