Strategy Food for thought: The spy who sold out

Thanks to a massive product integration deal in the latest [...]

read
Design Forgiving a pretty face

In the late spirit of Valentine’s day, I’ve been thinking [...]

read
Digital Facebook to agencies: how will people share your story?

As Facebook aims to go public on May 17 2012, [...]

read
Culture Is “The Pitch” an accurate reflection of our industry? read

Big Orange Slide

Thursday, May 24th, 2012

Live life, not advertising

September 30, 2010 by Leilah Ambrose

Illustration by Colin Craig

To be good at advertising, it helps to “get” advertising. And to “get” advertising, it pays to “know” advertising – be aware of the advertising that came before, the advertising that’s out there now and yes, have opinions on advertising yet to come. But does that loop close with loving advertising? Do you have to love it to be good at it?

Not in my opinion. I’ll tell you why.

Naturally, I can only speak to what I know, and I’m only a lowly, casually clothed creative with fantastic shoes. Really. Killer footwear.

I think that any creative’s biggest challenge is to create connections where none previously existed. In advertising, we have a daily mandate to associate a product or service with a feeling, an activity or an aspirational byline. Our job is to find the delicate threads between two disconnected things, and make them feel so obvious that our audience intuitively links them for a long time to come. Other ads can only reveal how other people have done this. The best tool for this job is personal experience.

Imagination has a torrid affair with experience. It is always trying to bend it, twist it, and make something of it. The greatest creative endeavors of all stripes are conceptually, cognitively and executionally totally dependent on having material to draw from. The same is true in advertising. Think of hallmark conceptual leaps: from Apple computers to George Orwell novels to the geographical explosion of a Monopoly board onto the city streets of London. Defining moments of our craft almost invariably require a deeper understanding of the social, physical or psychological world around us. You’re not going to find new insights into those things in Communication Arts annuals. No matter how many decades you comb through.

Loving advertising is about enthusiasm for your craft. But what about enthusiasm for the small details of everyday living? The lives well lived, the absurd human interest pieces, the tactile adventures? Those things add depth to your writing, gloss to your art direction. Detail to all things.

To my mind, creativity and curiosity have to be inherently linked. By looking at some of the foremost creative minds out there, we see how important exploration of the world is to their creative practice. In his TED talk, Stefan Sagmeister, the fêted designer, discusses why he takes one year off for every seven years of work. For Sagmeister, time off to explore his thoughts and the world around him is inherent to his success. They provide the fuel for the next seven years. They give him axis points he can link in the future.

I don’t dispute the importance of feeling compelled by other peoples’ creativity and connections. Knowing your landscape IS an experience. Similarly, I am not dismissing the power of loving what you do for a living. Having dedication to your art is as crucial to advertising as any other endeavor. It gives you the wings to find better solutions, delve into fine detail, be ambitious about your outputs. But it shouldn’t be your sole referent.

So perhaps I’m being blasphemous when I say that hearing “advertising is my life” saddens me to the degree it does. But the truth is, I’d always rather see someone’s individuality in their advertising than the other way around.

An outsider’s point of view

September 29, 2010 by Shannon Pearson

Illustration by Josiah Bilagot

As I sat down to write this post this morning I thought to myself, “What kind of approach should an ‘outsider’ take?” I don’t work for Grip, so by definition, I am an outsider. The thing is, I certainly don’t feel like one, nor have I been treated like one. Since moving to Toronto from Montreal in April of this year, I have interviewed at many advertising agencies. There are some really great ones out there. But Grip has some special traits that I think other agencies can learn from.

Have a space people want to work in.
To my mind, having a space that fosters fun and uniqueness makes sense in an agency. Knowing that Grip’s company blog is called “The Big Orange Slide” is different than seeing the slide in person. I’d never seen such a thing in a business before. I mused on how taking the slide down to the 5th floor might strengthen certain incidental muscle groups, resulting in better posture and an increased ability to sit at a desk for extended periods of time. Productivity goes up and everyone has fun. Genius!

Invite participation.
During my first meeting at Grip, I found out that they encourage everyone to contribute to the company blog. I found a blog post written by someone who had just started working at Grip a week or so earlier. They spoke about their experiences so far, and I found it to be quite open, honest and personal. This detail demonstrates that everyone’s opinion is important and welcome, an attitude that I believe is imperative to building a company’s confidence and growth.

Flag wave.
How a company presents itself to the world not only reflects its culture, but also builds the team within. To this end, I found Grip’s website absolutely amazing. I’d never seen a website like it before, and that says a lot coming from someone who spends most of their day in front of a computer. I liked the interactivity. I liked how each section was collapsible and that it had a horizontal rather than the standard vertical layout. I also liked how the work was intercut with fun facts about the company. It broke up the site well and kept my attention. I particularly liked the section on the website showing the means of commuting to work for Grippers. I thought of my own commute to work. I felt a kinship with the people who work there based on the insights into their day to day. By putting more than just work on their site, they’re demonstrating personal affiliation to their agency culture.

Offer mentorship and help.
I was amazed at the way I was treated and the effort that was made to help me succeed. After that first meeting, I was referred to a few people within the company to talk to about the area of work that I was interested in. I was given suggestions of books to read, podcasts to listen to, and people at other companies to contact. I received emails asking how my job search was going. I was floored by how much they cared, kept in touch, and just wanted to help. Having a personal rapport with an agency makes me want to invest in them – as a prospective employee, and brand supporter.

Overall, my experience with Grip so far has been extremely positive. Their continuous interaction with me, an outsider, has made me loyal to them. They even invited me to write this blog post, which has been a great honour. Even as a non-employee, I feel like I have a stake in the company. The above examples signify Grip’s unique organizational culture and forward-thinking attitude, and exemplify the kind of atmosphere I would one day hope to work in.

The Shrinking Airplane Seat

September 28, 2010 by Sara Vinten

Illustration by Nancy Ng

A few things come to mind when I think of airplanes. Painfully bland meals, stale recycled air, and most notably, the complete lack of legroom.

When it comes to legroom, the average coach seat has 31” or 32” of pitch (the distance from one point on a seat to the same point on the seat in front). Not exactly spacious.

So if an airline proposed something more ergonomically designed, it’s not unimaginable that us coach-flying plebs would jump on it. Right? Well, hang on to your seats. In fact, you might want to find one.

Enter, the SkyRider, the world’s first stand-up airplane seat. Until now it was just a myth – if not a running joke in the industry.

With a pitch of 23” or less, the SkyRider has been likened to a horse saddle and is intended for shorter flights of up to two hours. Meaning that those with short haul flights would find themselves perched precariously on this horse-saddle-wannabe of an airplane seat with their knees touching the seat in front of them. Meanwhile, Aviointeriors, the Italian aircraft seat manufacturer behind the SkyRider, says the new seat puts the passenger in “a comfortable, dynamic, upright and healthy position.” Really? I’ve ridden roller coasters with similarly-styled seating. Believe me, when the 3 minutes was up, I wanted off.

As for the practicality of the SkyRider, I’m torn. The comfort maven side of me thinks you’d have to be crazy to want to “sit” like this no matter how short the flight, or how low it takes the ticket price. Then again, this idea just might be novel enough that passengers may actually want to pay full price for it because it offers up a unique experience.

Hey, airlines! How about this solution: if you want to improve the air travel experience for everyone aboard, forget the seats and hand me a complimentary sedative instead.

The buyproduct of entertainment

September 27, 2010 by Warren Haas

Illustration by Nancy Ng

As I sit here enjoying a refreshing bottle of Budweiser, I can’t help but think about the role of product placement in advertising.

We see it in practically every TV show and movie: characters drink some particular brand of beverage, or use only one kind of computer or cell phone. It’s so common, I wonder if it still catches our attention.

The question I’d like to pose to you, savvy reader, is: when a product is placed in a piece of entertainment, how involved does it need to be for us to take notice?

Most people probably aren’t going to switch from Coke to Pepsi based on a fictional character ordering their “preferred” brand in a restaurant scene. But then there’s a character like James Bond, who has likely influenced many men to order a martini. The fact that he’s never specified what kind of vodka or vermouth he likes is a pretty big missed opportunity.

But if Mr. Bond’s line was “Martini. Shaken, not stirred. With Stolichnaya® vodka.” Would it be as famous? Or would including a brand name turn people off? It’s doubtful, given that Bond movies have a long history of using product placement. Even Casino Royale doubled as an ad for the full range of Sony products.

Then there are the shows and movies that incorporate products as a major plot point. The most blatant example in recent memory has the product right in the title: Harold and Kumar Go to White Castle. But in this instance, the product fits. The people expected to watch Harold and Kumar are more likely to be in a state of mind where eating at White Castle seems like a great idea.

Products are getting more and more integrated into every source of entertainment. On top of TV shows and movies, now products show up in everything from video games to music. There are a number of racing games that let you drive real car models, and that’s on top of the other ads you see within the game. And, of course, singers like Lady Gaga, whose music video for “Telephone” reaches parody proportions with its product placement. (But that doesn’t change the fact that the products are there.)

With TV shows, movies and video games, you could say the products and ads contribute to realism. They do exist in real life, after all. But should we be able to turn to entertainment to avoid exposure to advertising? And is this level of product placement, better called “integration,” effective? Does it help make a product more appealing, more meaningful?

What’s next? Is a movie like When Harry Met Sally in a McDonald’s far off?

If you were to compare Canada to an existing brand, which would it be?

September 24, 2010 by Big Orange Slide

Please leave your response in the comments section below

What not to put in your portfolio

September 23, 2010 by Jacoub Bondre

Illustration by Lora LeClair

I spend an embarrassing amount of time reviewing portfolios. Over time I’ve drawn this conclusion: for every one good book there are at least ten bad ones.  And of those bad ones, at least five are flat out horrifying.

The ones that really break my heart are the near-misses. The portfolios that show some great thinking, but are ruined by (for lack of a better term) a “deal breaker.”

A deal breaker can be anything from a misaligned font to a misspelled headline. Herewith, a list of some of the things portfolio reviewers here at Grip look for. Or judge harshly.

For Copywriters – by Leilah Ambrose

Proofread:
Yes, your ideas are super important. Trouble is, hidden deep in the word “copywriter” is the word “writer.” If you can’t spell check or proof your own headlines, body copy or overviews, you’re not exactly demonstrating dedication to the art.  It’s like Yul Brynner in the “Magnificent Seven” showing up to a gunfight with no bullets.
Or something.

Show elasticity:
Sure, you can prove that you have great ideas and writing chops in a series of print ad. But it helps to show off your process and creative versatility. Put your ideas into unconventional media. Find interactive elements. Talk to where you draw inspiration from. Link to blogs that you have. Celebrate your creativity and insight alongside your headlines.

Assess your WTF quotient:
Honestly, if it takes 15 minutes to explain your idea, even after showing your executions, it probably shouldn’t be in your portfolio.

Don’t Tolstoy your work:
Having breadth of thinking is good. Having breadth of thinking that rivals the length of War and Peace is not. Pick a handful of your best ideas, and the best executions of those ideas. 50 “meh” ideas don’t trump 5 great ones.

For Art Directors – by Colin Craig

Have a portfolio website:
It’s a given that every aspiring designer or art director must have a portfolio site. Even a few years ago, this could be a daunting project for the coding impaired. Now, with options like Cargo Collective and the Behance Network, it’s become far simpler to launch and maintain a professional-looking portfolio site. Use large, high-quality images. If you’re going to shoot your print work, make sure it’s crisp and well lit. Be clear about your role on each project.

Keep it professional:
Leave the Holga travel photos out. Same goes for art school paintings and neighborhood café installations. You should keep your portfolio tightly focused on art direction and design. Personal projects within this space are a different story though – they show a passion for the field, strong motivation and drive, and are a great way to explore media you haven’t had a chance to work on professionally.

Be a chameleon:
Artists and illustrators have personal, signature styles. Designers and art directors shouldn’t. Portfolios should demonstrate an ability to follow (and stretch!) brand standards, and execute in a wide variety of looks and styles.

And I’ll second Leilah’s “Keep it tight” and “No spelling typos.” Five or six projects are more than enough if that’s the scope of your best work. Spelling errors make me question an art director’s attention to detail and work habits.

For Developers – by Doug Riches:

Provide rationale:
It’s necessary to have code examples and descriptions of the project and, when possible, the final result. But the most important aspect to all of this is the rationale. Explain why you chose the examples you did. Too often, developer portfolios read like a hum-drum list of projects. Don’t be ordinary. What I need to see is examples of the code you worked on, why it’s best practice, and why it represents your best work.

Give context to your technologies:
Almost every developer portfolio lists out the same technologies. The problem is everyone lists the same thing without context. I want to see explanations and examples of the types of code you profess to know. Avoid itemizing every technology in the world with no context of examples of how you would use them.

Define your contribution:
Don’t include your CMS-driven Megacorp.com site without defining your role on the team, and how you were instrumental in making it awesome. This especially goes for front-end developers. When I see a cacophony of horrible CMS-generated front-end code without any context – well, it doesn’t show me that you get proper web standards.

Overall – by Jacoub Bondre

Show attention to detail:
Think Radiohead’s “Everything In Its Right Place.” Misaligned fonts, typos, shifts in content and navigation have the ability to almost immediately disqualify you from an opportunity.  Screwing up on the hard things is fixable and understandable.  You can be trained to use 3D in flash.  Typographic flair will come with experience.  However, being lazy about your details could be construed as a character flaw. And that’s something that can’t be taught.

Be honest:
I encourage all of our interns and freelancers to put any work they do here at Grip in their portfolio.  Even if their contribution was minor, all hands that touch a project mold and affect it.  That being said, you need to be honest about your contributions to a project.  People will find out quickly if you exaggerated your involvement. And that ain’t gonna look good.

Show me the money:
Only show your BEST work, bearing in mind that your best may not be something you did for a big, recognizable brand. If you did a project for Nike that sucks, and a project for Bob’s Tackle Shop that’s amazing, show the Bob’s Tackle work.  I will also echo Leilah’s “Keep it tight” comment.  I will lose interest after a max of eight pieces.  The words “more work available upon request” can be magic.

To sum up: your portfolio is your first impression. It’s a representation of what you’ve done, and how you work. If you’ve followed the above guidelines, the only thing standing between you and a job is whether or not you’re a jerk.

In defense of the :30 spot

September 22, 2010 by Ameet Acharya

Illustration by Nancy Ng

I was reflecting on some of the brilliant articles on the Big Orange Slide and it dawned on me: most of them are about digital advertising. Unsurprising, given the zeitgeist need for consumers to “like” an application to gain traction. But in recognizing this, there’s something that made me want to step back and consider some of my favourite campaigns, and consider what made them so appealing to me.

And then I realized that my default favourites were TV ads. And that I’m an interactive guy. I know, ballsy.

Going back, waaaay back, I decided to reacquaint myself with the infamous “Wassaaaa!” Budweiser commercial (actual number of ‘a’s varies from search to search).

As unlikely as it seems, some of you may not remember the iconic choral screaming between friends over a Bud. Relive one of the defining moments in 1990s advertising here.

Dispelling assumptions: I’m not only referring to the Bud Spot because Labatt is a client. Any advertiser would admit that this campaign undeniably attained mythic status and mass appeal the minute it was released. It was urban, it was hip, it was cool. It became part of how we talked – a catchphrase as embedded in our culture as “I can’t believe I ate the whole thing” and “Where’s the beef?” were in the 70s and 80s. And yes, it was a series of TV spots.

Since the first phlegmy “waaassaaaaa” met my virgin ears, it was inescapable. I greeted my crew and my family like, I imagine, a copywriter in Chicago gleefully intended me to. In a series of :30 spots that were heavy on story and light on hard sell, my slang changed. To my mind, there are few mediums that have the same ability to capture imagination, and tongues, the way TV has done. The web gives us an incredible opportunity to open conversations, change products and services, and co-create. But there will always be a place in my heart for a solid story told in :30, delivered when I least expect it. An example of how delightful things can wait between the blocks of TV programming.

I’m not dismissing the web. It’s my first love, and, let’s face it, the source of my paycheck. But I still think there’s a huge realm of opportunity to channel short, sweet and thoroughly catchy stories in a way that the :30 second format has done for so many brands.

If you can think of an online campaign that has carried as much cultural clout as some tv commercials out there, I’m happy to hear it. And don’t say Old Spice. They may have exploded on the Internet, but they began as :30 spots too.

Collaboration Nation

September 21, 2010 by Lana Pawziuk

Illustration by Nancy Ng

In this industry, like many others, collaboration is key to success.

There are many factors that play into a successful collaboration. Toronto’s Rotman School of Management recently held an event that discussed the concept of collaboration through the example of Douglas Coupland and the founders of Roots Canada, who were working together to create a collection of men’s and women’s clothing.

When Douglas Coupland (author, artist, and the man who coined the term “Gen X”) was introduced to Michael Budman and Don Green (founders of Roots Canada) under the pretense of a creative partnership, both parties were genuinely excited. In any collaboration, it is the intersection of two different perspectives and histories that yields the most fruit. The collaboration between Coupland and Roots is no exception.

Coupland has always been intrigued and fascinated with design and the manufacturing process. He designed all of the pieces, including the graphic and modern design treatments. Working with the team at Roots, the collection was refined and perfected to Douglas, Budman’s and Green’s satisfaction. Douglas describes the collaboration as an “ideological synchronization” that began with the common goal of defining what it means to be Canadian today.

From its inception, Roots has explored what it means to be Canadian. Having fallen in love with Canada while spending time at a summer camp in Algonquin Park, Budman and Green immigrated to Toronto from Detroit to create a concept based on these experiences. “What we make is who we are” said Michael Budman. The beaver logo is now recognized around the world, and the company continues to pride itself in bringing quality, outdoorsy lifestyle pieces direct to consumers.  While Roots is traditionally classic and safe on the colour spectrum, the collaboration with Coupland was like “when Bob Dylan went electric”.

The Most Serene Republic was called in to help launch the line, bringing the collection to life to the beat of the song Pink Noise. The video is vibrant and contemporary, full of hope and promise – a reflection of the collaborators’ shared vision of the future of Canada. The mix of band footage, models sporting the line, colour blocking and graphics is intended to be a reflection of the multi-cultural mosaic of modern day Canada.

Why was the Roots x Coupland x TMSR collaboration successful? Because the partners shared a common goal, had creative respect for one another, and it didn’t feel like homework.

In my mind, a successful collaboration is a golden horseshoe of three intersecting points:

1. Passion
2. Like-minded collaborators
3. A common goal

    Naturally, it helps if the process is fun, and the output ambitious. It also helps if each of the collaborators brings something new to the table, raising the stakes for each other and the project.

    However, a post on collaboration wouldn’t be complete without opening the floor to thoughts from its readers. What, from your experience, is key to a great collaboration?

    A testament to understanding your consumer

    September 20, 2010 by Randy Stein

    Illustration by Colin Craig

    You never know when or where you’ll be inspired.

    A couple of weeks ago I was in synagogue for the high holidays (and actually paying attention) when a story in the supplemental reading book really struck me.  It made me think about our “consumer” – the mysterious and enigmatic profile of a person we’re always targeting  in our advertising.  The story served as a reminder for me to always be mindful of what’s really important to them, as opposed to what they may say is important or what, heaven forbid, we assume about them. Hint: it’s not the products and services we’re advertising.

    The reading was a story/fable about a young girl who spent a great deal of time and effort decorating a box with very expensive wrapping paper.  Upon seeing his daughter using up the expensive wrapping, the father chastised her, as money was tight in the household.  The next morning, the daughter presented the beautifully-wrapped box to her father urging him to open it. The father, somewhat ashamed of having scolded his daughter the day before, excitedly opened the box – only to discover that the box was empty. As the father once again began to angrily chide his daughter for being so wasteful, she began to cry. “But Daddy,” she said “the box isn’t empty, I filled it with my kisses.”

    Yeah, it’s a nice story.  But what really hit home for me was how important it is to continually ask ourselves what it is that our consumers really want.  Somehow, I don’t think the story would have been as touching if the daughter had given her father an iPad.  And the truth is, any father (even an “early adopter”) would trade just one kiss from his daughter for a hundred iPads.

    We spend so much time trying to sell our clients’ products (granted, that’s what we’re paid to do) that we sometimes forget to dig a little deeper and really understand what our consumer is longing for. What do they really want?  If we can figure that out, and then figure out how the products that we are selling can help the consumer achieve that, we’ll win every time.

    At Grip, we believe in “values based” advertising. The essential premise being that by laddering up a product or service to a specific human value, we can make advertising more meaningful, relevant and effective.  After almost 9 years of taking this “values based” approach at Grip, it’s incredibly comforting to be reminded every now and again of its power.

    Oh, the mobile marketing irony…

    September 17, 2010 by Sean Mayers

    Illustration by Colin Craig

    Ed. note: This piece is being run in honour of the FITC Mobile conference being hosted in Toronto today, an event that Grip proudly sponsors.

    As a mobile marketing professional, I routinely go to mobile industry seminars, conferences and events.  One of the premiere events in Toronto occurs the first Monday of every month, and is unsurprisingly called Mobile Monday.

    Mobile Mondays provide a forum for anyone interested in mobile marketing to meet, network, learn and develop potential business contacts and opportunities.  With a range of unique and entertaining featured guest speakers and experts from the mobile industry, it sets out to provide value and insight into all things mobile. Here you can find a breadth of information ranging from the latest mobile web applications, social media and mobile integration strategies, to samples of augmented reality campaigns and the latest mobile marketing trends.

    To attend an event, one must visit their website and fill out an Eventbrite submission form. From there, you will receive a confirmation email that includes an attached PDF version of an admission ticket.  You must then print a hard copy version of the ticket and physically take it with you to the event.

    So who amongst you has spotted the irony? I’ll give you slightly more than a hint: it’s a mobile marketing forum that requires a printed ticket to attend.

    Why is a forum that extols the virtues of mobile marketing strategies rejecting mobile strategies for its own events?  It’s like opening a coffee shop to serve tea.

    For me, the issue is twofold:

    Firstly, there is no mobile version of the website. This is not very helpful if you’re trying to view it away from your home or office computer.

    Secondly, the ticketing debacle. A simple mobile admission coupon sent directly to your device is a far more elegant solution than the additional step of printing a paper admission ticket and remembering to carry it with you to gain entry.

    While I still support Mobile Mondays as an effective forum to attend, learn and network with mobile-minded people, I think its time for Mobile Mondays to walk the walk as well as talk the talk.

    After all, walking while talking is part of why mobile is awesome.