
My first word was “no.” I’m pretty sure when I get around to having a child their first word will be “now.”
I think there’s some lovable curmudgeon in every generation who says things like, “In my day, people paid more attention,” “They respected what you had to say,” “They read books,” et cetera. But for the first time in my life, I have to agree. Modern-age attention spans are getting, well, shorter.
A search for statistics on attention spans returns curiously few results, perhaps because people are hard-pressed to focus on completing a five-minute survey. But authors and journalists alike have written on the subject. Psychologically, we are shifting.
Where does our need for immediacy stem from? When did we become generation “now”? I’m inclined to believe it’s the advancement of technology that has caused the apparent trend towards impatience. From the computer to the Internet. From the cell phone to the smart phone. Facebook and Twitter. The combination of all of the above. We are disturbed when access to information is blocked, our reception is dropped, the server goes down. Every one of these things has caused us to expect things sooner.
So if society is shifting under the influence, so too must advertising. We are, after all, an industry built around capturing a person’s attention. Does advertising need to get to the point sooner? How do we do it? Digital advertisers already know that they have about three seconds to capture your attention. Are we going to start expecting advertising to get to the point sooner?
Media like transit advertising have the advantage of catching people when they have fewer distractions. But will TV spots need to be reduced to 10 seconds? Radio to 5? Will billboards and print ads only be effective if they say “BUY ME OR DIE”?
Engagement is one alternative. iPhone and Facebook apps, Twitter accounts – these are the new advertising. Even so, they require a person’s engagement for more than a few seconds to be successful.
I think now, more than ever, people are demanding something worth paying attention to. Which, compellingly, raises the bar on how we make ads more arresting.
Food for thought: The spy who sold out

Forgiving a pretty face
Facebook to agencies: how will people share your story?
Is “The Pitch” an accurate reflection of our industry?

8 Comments











