Strategy Standing on the RIM of greatness

RIM has been in the news a lot lately, and [...]

read
Design Your brand is your user experience

There’s a lot to be said for the growing field [...]

read
Digital Are you obsessed with Pinterest? read
Culture Big Orange Valentines

We’ve all got that special someone in our agency: Your [...]

read

Big Orange Slide

Thursday, February 23rd, 2012

Of copyright and pie

November 30, 2010 by Steven Hudak

Illustration by Brian Ross

It may seem curious to assert that computer guys like myself are often grouped into the same taxonomy as doctors, lawyers and accountants. Granted, we can’t vouch for your character on a passport application. The thing that binds us with this unlikely group: the assumption that we can and will offer our advice or services for free.

Most of the time I’m asked benign things like which operating system I prefer, the best budget laptop/smart phone/web cam to purchase. However, one of the more troubling and predominating questions is whether I can procure a pirated copy of Photoshop, Windows or Office. I say “benign” because I knew these folks aren’t fixing to open a kiosk to sell software with hand-cut liner notes. Again, I’m not a lawyer, but last I checked I don’t think there is a decriminalized version of copyright infringement for personal use.

Typically, I respond by forwarding them to the open source community’s version of what they needed: GIMP, Ubuntu or Open Office. Unlike Steve Ballmer I don’t believe the fruits of the open source community are communistic – but I do believe that access to information is a right, not a privilege. That being said, I’m a fellow maker, and authorship is partly the source of my livelihood.

This is why certain cases of intellectual property have become so interesting to me. In case you’re not familiar with it, the magazine Cook Source hands home cooks and bakers tried and true recipes. Tried and true, it may be noted, by the authors who the recipes were stolen from. How do you know that the recipes are stolen? After all, two distinct parties may use the same ingredients as means to a similar delicious end. In this case, the admission of guilt came from the editor of the magazine herself, who credited the original authors of the recipes. In a frenzy of email with one of the authors, the editor mistakenly claimed the author owed her money, because her recipe had required heavy editing from Cook Source before successfully going to press.

I believe the normal recourse is for lawyers to duke it out and volley fines of $250,000 per copyright infringement. In this case, the outrage of those who backed the original authors were the deciding factor. A blog was started to publish the emails and fight for the honour of the recipes’ original author. The magazine was shamed into taking down their website. The editor’s claim that “Internet finders are keepers” was beyond her means to fight.

This story proves to me that though people are happy to consume pirated content, there are some cases where they are willing to defend authorship. Surprisingly, those who compromise intellectual property may wake a sleeping giant they never suspected was there.

Reinventing the runway

November 29, 2010 by Dave Hamilton

The Official Ralph Lauren 4D Experience – London from Ralph Lauren on Vimeo.

Every category, product or service, has its conventions. Things that are done over and over again either because they work, because we can’t think of anything new, or because not doing them would risk a tantrum from the otherwise slumbering executive floor. For fashion retailers and brands like Ralph Lauren, one of those conventions is the fashion show.

Earlier this month, RL managed to reinvent the conventional fashion show in honour of the tenth anniversary of their e-commerce site.

The effort (and this entailed considerable effort) was deemed “the world’s first 4-dimensional show” by the folks at RL. While this description is somewhat disputable according to many comments I’ve read around the blogosphere, in this blogger’s humble opinion it was nonetheless a spectacular re-imagining.

A 10-minute light show was projected onto the façade of Ralph Lauren’s stores on Madison Avenue in New York and on Bond Street in London. The façade of the two stores came to life with projected images of models and polo players towering over the crowd, amid ambient sound and a mist of Ralph Lauren fragrance.

Even more powerful, for me at least, was the behind-the-scenes story of how it was pulled off. A team of about 150 people worked for months: First, intricate architectural renderings of the New Bond Street and Madison Avenue stores were created using 3D scanners and human modelers. Then ¾ scale replicas of the stores were built on a Hollywood-style sound stage so that real models could be shot in front of the façade. The film was then pulled into a 3D software environment where a team of animators (some of whom worked on Harry Potter) designed and melded visual effects. Finally, projectors – of even higher resolution than IMAX – were positioned so that the finished 3D film could be lined up perfectly with each of the real life, flagship stores on Bond Street and Madison Ave.

In terms of reach? Hundreds experienced it live in each of the respective cities, while millions got to witness and share the spectacle across the web. PR, as you can imagine, has been considerable as well.

How well does Ralph Lauren’s 4D Fashion Show score for reinvention of this well trodden category convention? I’m thinking at least a seven, but that may owe to the fact that it marries my past life as a theatre tech with my current career as an advertising creative.

I’d love to hear what you think.

Best of November

November 26, 2010 by Big Orange Slide

Illustration by Haley Fiege

We entered the season of darker days, premature holiday promos and advertising award shows with terror in our hearts and feverish ideas in our brains. Here’s a roundup of what November had to show for it.

Advice for intern hopefuls – by Jon Finkelstein
Partner, Creative and Writer, Compelling Jon Finkelstein walks through what Creative Directors look for when selecting interns.

Grip Interviews: Jamie King – by Ian Mackenzie
An Art Director weighs in on his learnings and yearnings.

Do Mo’ for a Cause – by Adam Luck
A careful consideration of why Movember is changing the face of not-for-profit marketing.

The agency of the future – by Jacoub Bondre
What will shape the agency structures of tomorrow? Jacoub pontificates.

Designing aura – by Pia Nummi
Why the marriage of good design and good advertising is what truly builds a brand.

Comment of the month:
“I’m not sure I like this question to begin with. Smart tactics are important. Big ideas are important. Sometimes a big idea IS a smart tactic (that’s what, for example, patents are).

You shouldn’t have to choose between execution and inspiration.” – Hayles

In response to: Q+A: True or False: a “big idea” always trumps a “smart tactic”

Off-brand or Cattle Brand?

November 25, 2010 by Curtis Westman

Illustration by Brian Ross

I’m a big fan of meat.

That’s not to say that I don’t enjoy vegetables; a well-cooked vegetarian meal will always outdo a mediocre steak, especially if you find it hard to silence the bovine screams that haunt your nightmares. But basically, nothing beats a 32 oz piece of meat and an impacted colon.

One company in Montreal doesn’t agree. Matt and Nat manufacture vegan designer accessories – promising that handbags and wallets alike are virginal of animal product or byproduct. They also have a company policy to uphold their brand image: namely, that no employee shall partake in the sweet, sweet flesh of another living creature.

At least not in the lunchroom or at restaurant meetings with clients.

In this case, the company’s brand image — that of an eco-conscious, animal-friendly venture — has succeeded the rights of their 18 employees. And one former worker is taking them to court for it.

On one hand, the company is privately-held and argue that they should be entitled to make whatever rules they feel necessary, whether pertaining to animals, plants, or incorporeal dark matter. As advertisers, it’s deadly seriously when something is accused of being “off-brand.” Admittedly in the case of Matt and Nat, mealtime preferences certainly apply. Consider the hypothetical image of an agency that has launched an anti-petroleum environmental campaign, and show up to industry events in full PVC body suits.

It’s important to uphold the products and services of your clients. Agencies seek to create brand ambassadors, and must be viewed as the vanguard effort. Is it a brand’s responsibility to ensure their employees both love and live the brand – even behind closed doors?

True or False: a “big idea” always trumps “a smart tactic”?

November 24, 2010 by Big Orange Slide

Please leave your response in the comments section below

Designing aura

November 23, 2010 by Pia Nummi

Illustration by Nancy Ng

People often ask me the differences between design and advertising. Seeing as I’m a designer in an agency context, the delineation isn’t as obvious as it may seem. But when I attended a recent DesignThinkers lecture by David Turner (of brand design agency Turner Duckworth) I got the one-liner I was looking for: “Design delivers what advertising promises.”

Design is the physical or experiential side of a brand. Advertising is what speeds those things into the world. The two hold hands, working in complement to achieve that elusive combination of reach and allure.

In his talk, Turner presented his principles of iconic design with supporting case studies. Abercrombie and Fitch, the go-to uniform for expensively underdressed millenials, has meticulously designed their mysterious and exclusive teen flavour. Billboard and print advertising use provocative, black and white images of toned male midriffs shot by Bruce Weber to promise an adult experience dressed in teen clothing. The mall experience delivers on this promise with darkly-lit stores and shuttered windows – a complete contrast to the bright, busy and colourful windows of the Gap, Old Navy and Forever 21. At every brand touchpoint, AF sets itself apart by offering up a simmering brew of sexuality and disaffected teenage style.

AF is an example of branding in isolation, but what role does design play in elevating co-branding campaigns? Turner Duckworth faced this very problem when Coke, an iconic brand, co-branded with the Winter Olympics. Their solution: develop collectable cans that leverage the swoosh of the iconic logo as a ski hill, a snowboarders’ pike and an ice skater’s swirl. The cans, beautifully designed, used the logo to make a clever connection to winter Olympic sports. Wieden + Kennedy closed the loop with TV ads that animated skiers, snowboarders and skaters to carbonated bubbles mixed to sound like fresh carved snow and ice. Linking the product redesign with delightful animated ads successfully created a second-nature link between two unrelated experiences.

Earlier this year at The Rotman School of Business, artist and writer Douglas Coupland and Roots founders Don Green and Michael Budman presented their thoughts about their recent creative collaboration. In a telling moment, an MBA student and budding entrepreneur asked the Roots boys where she should spend her small marketing budget. Green greeted her question with a passionate declaration that the best money they ever spent was on their logo and branding elements. He explained how (now defunct) design firm Cooper Hines had stressed the importance of investing in every consumer touch point to ensure a luxurious consumer experience across everything from receipts to shoe boxes to shopping bags. The strategy worked: Roots went from selling 7 pairs of their Negative Heel Boots on day 1, to opening 75 new stores in the next two years. Roots’ experience is entirely their own, and remains fresh and iconic 37 years later.

Sometimes we at ad agencies get caught up in delivering the “big idea” for a campaign, when the more powerful insights come from how the brand fits into our consumers’ lifestyles and identities. When thinking about experiences, sometimes simplicity and tactile design is the most powerful place to connect with your consumer.

Grip Ltd. presents: 101 Thoughts on Advertising: Part 3

November 19, 2010 by Big Orange Slide

Illustration by Brian RossWelcome to the third installment in our ongoing series of reflections, snippets, and miscellaneous impressions of advertising. This week, we suspect that

Advertising is:

22) a love/hate relationship – and not just for the public.

23) where artists go to not make art.

24) one of the few places a writer can make a decent living.

25) what advertising does.

26) a force that needs to move faster than culture itself.

27) at its best when fearless.

28) about shining flashlights into corners.

29) a gene pool of people who work hard and play harder.

30) driven by deadlines more than we care to admit.

31) here to stay.

Changing the way we design think

November 18, 2010 by Hayley Malcho

Illustration by Hayley MalchoAn iCal reminder popped up on my computer on August 16, reminding me that Design Thinkers 2010 was going to take place in November. Yes, I did have my iCal remind me almost four months before the conference was scheduled to occur.

This is why.

We all work in an industry obsessed with sharing ideas, learning how to think, learning how not to think, accepting that maybe how not to think is actually how we should think – all in the interests of making an impression on our peers and the world at large. To my mind, two speakers at Design Thinkers were compelling representations of where design is going. The first, Don Lindsay, a man determined to change the face (quite literally) of technology. The other, Scott Thomas, changing the face of the world as we know it.

One spoke of selling a product and the other spoke of selling a change.

Lindsay represented the product angle of things. His pedigree includes time at Apple (working side-by-side with Steve Jobs for 6+ years), then Microsoft, and he is currently at Research in Motion, working on the launch of the Blackberry 6 and Blackberry Torch. With an entire career dedicated to researching what consumers want, he had this to offer: “It’s not about designing a moment. It’s about designing all moments.”

On the other end of the spectrum we have Scott Thomas, the designer behind the amazing design done for Barack Obama’s political campaign in 2007. The attention generated by that campaign gave America its first black president and the highest number of votes (over 65,000,000) in presidential history. It may not be that design won Obama the presidency, but it surely changed the way we viewed the American political system. Scott Thomas and his team didn’t help to design a moment; they helped to re-design a country.

Both men have made their names in the industry and will continue to do so. I urge you to go out and find out about them for yourselves. Read Scott Thomas’ new book, find out who they are, how they’ve affected the world that you live in, and more importantly, what they have done and how they’ve done it. Because it very well might affect what you do tomorrow.

The agency of the future

November 17, 2010 by Jacoub Bondre

Illustration by Nancy Ng

This year I have been asked to speak at Humber College’s Adweek symposium along with industry peeps like Cam Wykes, Ignacio Oreamuno and Barry Quinn. The question to be addressed: “What does an advertising agency look like in 2020?”

Admittedly, the question has me in new territory. While I have never shied away from making short-term predictions, I prefer to make suggestions or play the skeptic. Personally, I don’t believe anyone can accurately predict where technology or social trends will head in the long term. Chaos theory dictates that emergent phenomena, like the Internet or social media, cannot be predicted or replicated (thanks Jason Theodor!)

All that being said, what we can do is examine the factors that can and will likely have a profound effect on our industry over the next decade.

Convergence

Convergence is the ongoing process of all media amalgamating into one large complex channel. The most apt example of this is ubiquitous access to media through any number of devices. At any given time, I can surf the web, watch TV and movies, listen to the radio, and communicate and read through my computer, mobile device or game console. The combination of channels will be, in my opinion, the final step to the digital space’s being fully integrated into agency models and culture. Agencies that embrace this will be giants – and not of the dinosaur variety.

Social

I’ve made no mystery of how I think social media is shaping marketing territory. Customers still want to consume all types of advertising, as long as it is compelling and provides them with some value.  But customers also want to be part of the conversation. They want to feel as if they have influence over the brands they love.

I anticipate the rise of community management. Whether people are called social media experts, community managers or social strategists, agencies will need to ensure their offices are staffed with people who understand how brands can talk with their consumers.

Illustration by Nancy Ng

Generalists on top

A few months ago I wrote a post titled “A prescription for a new agency” in which I defended the role of both generalists and specialists in the new world order of agencyland. Generalists understand their client’s business needs on a creative and strategic level, and also have a broad understanding of all the channels available to communicate with the consumer. Specialists will have an expert knowledge of key channels, as well as an understanding of how the latter plug into the larger campaign.  Generalists can “diagnose” the client’s objective and refer to the proper specialists to execute against it.

At this point I feel it disingenuous not to mention Ignacio’s Giant Hydra model, in which generalists make up the core of the agency, supported by a larger network of skilled and proven specialists. In this case, specialists are not permanent members of the core agency, which makes it quite flexible. Giant Hydra can tailor its teams based on each client ask.  While not questioning the viability of this model, I’d question its ability to maintain the depth of brand affinity that comes from consistency and permanence.

The Unknown

Master Yoda aside, no one can predict the future. But I’m prepared to wager an educated guess that the biggest challenge agencies will face is adapting to growing collaborative models. Any agency that doesn’t want to believe that creatives can think strategically, producers can think creatively and client service personnel can think productively, is missing the boat. My hope is both for a decline in “discipline-based” hires and an upsurge in finding the smart and curious and resourceful. I feel pretty well poised in my own agency for that.

Do mo’ for a cause

November 16, 2010 by Adam Luck

Illustration by Nancy Ng

Children may shriek, women may wail, but as we speak, Mo’bretheren worldwide are laying down their follicles for a cause. For thousands of men, the penultimate month of the year has officially been redubbed Movember, a full month of confronting men’s health issues – like prostate cancer – full in the face.

Like so many other great ideas, Movember was born at the bottom of a pint glass. A few guys in Australia had the inkling that moustaches could become the new “ribbon” for men’s health issues, a subject that often goes overlooked or otherwise neglected. Since then, men the world over have been steadily documenting mo’ growth on personal or team pages to raise donations. In Canada alone, Movember has gone from 2,000+ participants and $545K in donations to a 2010 year-to-date total of 107,710 participants and $8.8 MM in donations. That being said, what makes Movember such a successful not-for-profit model?

To start, let’s classify what “success” for a not-for-profit look like. I’d argue that the three primary pillars would be participation, awareness and fundraising. Of course, you need the first two (engaged participants and awareness around the issue) to make the third (donation) successful. Here are a few things are helping to raise mo’ awareness:

Stay true to one target
Like any good brand/cause/trend/fad that appeals to a younger consumer, Movember focused on key influencers to their target – younger, urban, creative males – precisely the type that would embrace the challenge of bringing moustaches back. Unite this with creative feel and tone for campaign elements and events and you find yourself with a cache of ’staches that is tough to sniff at.

Employ unconventional tactics to raise awareness
Movember has eschewed lapels – the preferred message carrier of the lions’ share of other not-for-profits. Instead, they own the faces of all their participants for the entire month of November, driving unbelievable amounts of word of mouth. Not only that, but the ability to groom your own facial hair puts an additional, customized spin on the program, opening up inexhaustible avenues for ’stache play for those who prefer more of a Hogan over a Dirty Sanchez.

Give an emotional reason to quickly engage with the cause
For many of the men I spoke to, Movember means having fun with their sense of masculinity. The fact that sponsorship raised one for a good cause was secondary – but a natural output. Tepid participants still help Movember reach objectives by raising awareness. Every time you look in the mirror, you are reminded of the cause. (So is your girlfriend, but that’s an incidental point.)

Allow for dynamic participation
A proven model for causes like MS and Breast Cancer, Movember relies on a team dynamic for fundraising. Individuals and corporate teams have fun and raise sponsorship money collectively. Collective and individual growth is a daily conversation and demonstration – both at the office and online through channels like the Movember Mo’gress app. Even if you can only achieve creepy pre-teen growth, you’re still championing the cause.

Embrace online and social media to help get the word out to others
This is point-of-entry to any not-for-profit, but Movember has a built-in shareability that makes it undeniably powerful in the space. Mo’gress is not only the property of a sponsorship page – it exists on Facebook, Twitter, avatars, t-shirts and videos as naturally as you please. Spreading the word is uncomplicated, fun, and abundant.

The ’stache may be an old-school accessory, but there is no arguing that Movember is a hyper-current, sexy case study for any not-for-profit. Participants and message recipients look forward to good, clean unshaven fun in the name of a great cause.

————–

If you are participating in Movember as a “grower” (or even if you aren’t), you can do your part to raise awareness and donations for Movember by pledging to donate to a friend or team through their mospace, or through third-party campaigns like Budweiser’s ‘Stache for Cash app that donates $1 to Movember for every pic you ’stache.