Strategy Food for thought: The spy who sold out

Thanks to a massive product integration deal in the latest [...]

read
Design Forgiving a pretty face

In the late spirit of Valentine’s day, I’ve been thinking [...]

read
Digital Facebook to agencies: how will people share your story?

As Facebook aims to go public on May 17 2012, [...]

read
Culture Is “The Pitch” an accurate reflection of our industry? read

Big Orange Slide

Wednesday, May 23rd, 2012

Ad Ageism

December 7, 2010 by Sara Vinten

Illustration by Nancy Ng

I’ve lost track of the number of times I’ve heard the words “advertising is a young person’s job.”

Yes, the average age of people in this business is visibly lower than in other industries. Perhaps it’s as basic as scheduling: advertising is rarely, if ever, a true 9-5 gig. Long hours can be a pretty big deterrent for those looking to start a family; they can also be tough to sustain over time. Does this factor into the argument in favour of younger talent? Likely. Is it the long and short of the case? Likely not. Often times there is a tougher rationale to contend with.

Advertising – indeed all media – has traditionally feasted on the young. Younger people, especially those of the digital age, are hardwired to process change fast and furiously. They don’t need to try to stay current, they are current by virtue of being young. It’s like a wireless metaphysical signal  plies the 18-50 demographic with a grasp of shifting trends. Agencies seek out youth for their risk-taking, fresh outlook, sponge-like impressionability. And they know how to sell to the young, which is possibly the most crucial piece. We are, after all, in the business of selling.

Marketing is consumed with hooking young demographics early on, with an eye to converting them to brand advocates by the time their consumer habits are more established. However, this raises a question: with the baby boom/echo taking the lion’s share of consumer spending, does the agency cult of youth make sense? Does privileging the daring of youth trump experience and identifying with your audience ?

The reality is that with age comes seniority. In our world, that seniority necessitates starting your own agency by a certain age. But when you think about the rationale of say, having women weigh in on campaigns targeting women, the blind infatuation with rounding out with younger talent seems a little odd.

That being said, young is a frame of mind, not an age group. And I don’t know about you, but I plan on being young forever.

Is this ad effective?

December 6, 2010 by Leilah Ambrose

Photo via @unbrelievable

‘Tis the season to hard sell the ties that bind. But it’s rare that you find holiday ads as contentious as the Spence Diamonds work, currently bedecking Toronto’s transit shelters. It’s hardly surprising for diamond or jewelry companies to use couples as their primary targets, but to actively – even gleefully – initiate a psychological flame war with singles is a bold move. To say the least.

I’d just cracked open Wordpress to document my sputtering indignation when a fellow Gripper casually offered up their interpretation: That without the help of Spence Diamonds, your relationship is hanging by a thread. I sat, stared, and realized that this ad is a verbal optical illusion – by turns inclusive and manipulative, and flippant and divisive.

I’d be interested in hearing your thoughts.

Advertising on demand

December 2, 2010 by Jacoub Bondre

Illustration by Brian Ross

There is huge talk about market saturation and customer apathy, and while I don’t deny these factors exist, I think our perspective on them is skewed.

When asked, people will likely claim to hate advertising. However, there are popular shows and sites that demonstrate the contrary. The reality is that these are people who simply don’t enjoy being interrupted with information they don’t need. On the other hand, if you were to advertise to them when they are actually requesting information, you would likely find their viewpoint on the whole thing somewhat changed. These are the opportunities that open true channels of communication for marketers.

Yelp is a service (via website and mobile application) that allows registered businesses to offer up listing information, supported by public ratings and comments on their experiences.  To my mind, Yelp is the primitive start of a new strategic wave of advertising.  Its mandate is to be relevant and available on demand. I like to call it Quick Service Advertising, though have to credit Jon Finkelstein for the name.

Naturally, the dynamic and targeted nature of mobile opens up a Pandora’s Box of QSA opportunities for marketers. That being said, there are more traditional formats that are also cleverly integrating user participation in their own advertising process.

Hulu (how I miss thee) is an online broadcast service owned by NBC/Universal with a unique approach to advertising. It allows the free streaming of shows and movies from NBC, ABC, FOX, Disney, etc. for a simple price: that viewers accept advertising as part of their terms of streaming. At the beginning of each show, users select whether they would prefer to view a series of :15 spots from a variety of self-selected brands, or watch a 2 minute ad format from one brand and watch the balance of the show without interruption.

Research conducted by the Publicis group identified that top-of-mind awareness for brands in the short format ads hit 288%, whereas viewers identified a 438% top of mind awareness for brands with long format ads. These results are impressive. I believe, as did the researchers, that the increase of efficacy can be attributed to choice and relevance to the consumer.

On-demand entertainment is increasingly at our fingertips. Our media models, however, have yet to catch-up. Televisions in Canada, hooked up through cable, satellite, or fiberoptics (which constitutes the vast majority of households) currently have the technological ability to move to a media model similar to that of Hulu’s. Mobile devices hand advertisers the ability to be there for customers when they want us. Few at this point has realized this potential. The first person or company to nail it wins the jackpot.

Does the traditional AD/Copywriter team still make sense?

December 1, 2010 by Big Orange Slide

Please leave your response in the comments section below