Strategy Food for thought: The spy who sold out

Thanks to a massive product integration deal in the latest [...]

read
Design Forgiving a pretty face

In the late spirit of Valentine’s day, I’ve been thinking [...]

read
Digital Facebook to agencies: how will people share your story?

As Facebook aims to go public on May 17 2012, [...]

read
Culture Is “The Pitch” an accurate reflection of our industry? read

Big Orange Slide

Wednesday, May 23rd, 2012

Grip Ltd. presents: 101 thoughts on advertising: Part 6

April 11, 2011 by Big Orange Slide

Illustration by Brian Ross

Spring’s damp air full of life makes us eager to share some new-growth thoughts on our industry. Today, there are some at Grip who believe that

Advertising is:

42) the art of attraction.
43) only as valuable at the story that drives it.
*44) “a tax you pay for being unremarkable”
45) a minotaur’s labyrinth, relying on “like”s as navigation.
46) expensive to make, and even more expensive to ignore.
47) a sticky pudding of listening, ignoring, believing and disbelieving.
48) zeitgeist.
49) about superceding the obvious.
50) one of those rare careers where eating sandwiches that were ordered for a meeting 5 hours ago is not only condoned – it’s encouraged.
51) what I do. But perhaps not who I am.
(*actually paraphrased from Robert Stephens, founder of Geek Squad.)

Sharing the credit

April 8, 2011 by Jacoub Bondre

Illustration by Emma Watham

Student often ask me how to credit the work in their book. The answer is simple. List everyone involved, clearly identify your contribution, and be honest about it.

But this question parlays into a bigger one: how should one credit work in general?

This can be a very contentious issue in the world of advertising, especially when award time comes around. It’s also an issue that will become more complex as campaigns extend themselves into multiple media.

I, for one, like the “everyone who touched this gets credit” approach. I was having coffee with a colleague of mine, Virginia Magaletta (ECD at Twist Image) last week, and she said something relevant that I will now attempt to paraphrase.

“Say you come up with an idea that involves rain. At a glance, the fact that a guy sitting nearby mentioned a ham sandwich 15 minutes beforehand may seem totally irrelevant. But who’s to say that your mind didn’t go from ham to pig, pig to mud, mud to water, water to rain? The human mind works in weird ways, so maybe the guy that said ham sandwich should get some credit for the rain idea.”

Now crediting ham sandwich guy may be a bit extreme, but it makes a point. Integrated campaigns can extend over mass, OOH, digital, social, mobile, and experiential realms. The full complement of teams is therefore huge, and the gamut of input clearly varied. The standard credit list of account and creative leads rarely include members of the QA team. If, however, you were to remove a single person from the equation, there’s a possibility that the output wouldn’t have been the same.

Personally, I think the credit list forms for award shows and trade magazines/websites should be extended to reflect this new reality.  Thoughts?

When big telcos get disconnected

April 7, 2011 by Sylvie Chicoine

Illustration by Julia Morra

In the same way that the music industry was slow to embrace the open sharing of music, so too are the telcos in responding to the rise of streaming entertainment. Service providers like Netflix, iTunes, and TekSavvy have turned into serious contenders when it comes to TV and Internet offerings. And Rogers and Bell should prepare themselves for some major competition.

It’s no surprise that a recent comScore survey established that the amount of video content people are watching has exploded over the past three years. YouTube is at the head of that movement. With over 2 billion views per day it has been partly responsible for the shift in behaviour from watching TV on the tube to watching it online. Now users are willing to pay for that streaming entertainment.

Grip Group Account Director/Media Maven, Kristina, is one of those people. Kristina replaced her Rogers Internet and TV services with ones like TekSavvy, Netflix, and iTunes, and her yearly costs have dropped from over $2,400 a year to under $1,200. She did run into some challenges during the transition; for example, Netflix doesn’t always have the most recent TV series episodes available and she sometimes misses channel surfing. Regardless, Kristina’s consuming as much content as she was during her Rogers days (if not more). Only now she gets all the content she wants, along with some serious cost savings.

With the number of people like Kristina switching over to streaming entertainment, I’m waiting to see how, when, and if the telcos will respond. Rogers, for one, seems reluctant to adapt to new trends. With the number of calls and direct mail pieces I’ve received from Rogers pushing their home phone service, it’s clear they can react to a dying trend, but what they really need to do is react with as much gusto to a growing one.

My guess is the rise of streaming content will eventually force the telcos to make their pricing more competitive. Either that, or Rogers will simply buy up Netflix and TekSavvy and expand their properties on the Monopoly board. The latter seems more likely.

The changing face of celebrity

April 6, 2011 by Trevor Gourley

Illustration by Nancy Ng

celebrity |səˈlebrətē|
noun ( pl. -ties)
a famous person.

Until very recently, becoming a celebrity was a confluence of talent, effort and money. Stars were not born, as we’re sometimes led to believe – they were cultivated and groomed. Studios inked actors and actresses to multi-picture deals and staked a great deal of time and money on promoting the hell out of a few men and women. The public had no choice – certain individuals were front and centre in popular culture and we forcibly revered them.

Things would remain largely unchanged, but then came the advent of the (ugh) “viral” video. Nowadays, you don’t need to be handpicked by studios and groomed to achieve notoriety or, dare I say it, celebrity. The advent of online video sharing brought about the likes of Star Wars Kid. If you don’t know what that is, let me be the first to welcome you to changing face of celebrity: a Quebecois high-school student that re-enacted a scene from “The Phantom Menace” with a golf club, in the media room of his high school. Unfortunately for this poor kid, it was caught on tape and uploaded to the Internet. Fame is now a matter of mishaps shared amongst friends and then leaked to a larger audience with a healthy appetite for humiliation.

This brings us to Rebecca Black. As I write this, her video for “Friday” has accumulated 82,785,306 views and that total will have risen by several million at the time of this article’s publication. She is perhaps one of the best known people in North America right now, earning parody from some of the greatest minds in comedy (and Jimmy Fallon), earning the adoration and ire of an entire generation, and is a fixture on the talk show circuit. You can argue about her merits as an artist (she has none), but what does her astronomical success mean for the nature of celebrity? Her ascendancy to stardom involved no talent or effort and a paltry sum of money.

As the Internet increasingly fulfills Andy Warhol’s prophecy of “15 minutes of fame,” we have to reconsider how we’ve defined “fame.” The Internet has made it unnervingly easy to capture public imagination for reasons intentional or unintentional. As our manufactured icons get bigger, and our hapless Internet stars gain traction more easily, does the idea of “a celebrity” lose credibility or meaning?

What is the role of skepticism in the creative process?

April 5, 2011 by Big Orange Slide

Please leave your response in the comments section below

*Ed. note: The word “skepticism” has ousted the word “cynicism” in the popularity poll. Keep the comments coming!

Best of March

April 4, 2011 by Big Orange Slide

Illustration by Haley Fiege

In like a lion, out like a lamb? Perhaps not. But, more predictably, Big Orange Slide came into March with some great posts – and out with a few more.

What is cool? – by Daniel Gerichter
A reflection on the ever-shifting landscape of “cool,” and how it may not be as impossible to attain as it once was.

The return of the artisan – by Jacoub Bondre
Jacoub shouts for a rebellion against the cult of “good enough,” and a return to a time when people invested themselves into their craft.

Big Orange Slide asks: What makes a good brief – by Jon Finkelstein
Jon brings the Slide its first vblog post – and no lack of intriguing debate as a result.

Grip Interviews: Jamie Harvey – by Ian Simpson
Jamie Harvey, blogger for hardrockchick.com, walks through how social media has changed the landscape of music appreciation and consumption.

Comment of the month:

“Double Mint gum.
They could change their name to Dublin Mint for the day.”

In response to: Q+A: Name a brand that isn’t affiliated with St. Paddy’s Day – but should be