
Student often ask me how to credit the work in their book. The answer is simple. List everyone involved, clearly identify your contribution, and be honest about it.
But this question parlays into a bigger one: how should one credit work in general?
This can be a very contentious issue in the world of advertising, especially when award time comes around. It’s also an issue that will become more complex as campaigns extend themselves into multiple media.
I, for one, like the “everyone who touched this gets credit” approach. I was having coffee with a colleague of mine, Virginia Magaletta (ECD at Twist Image) last week, and she said something relevant that I will now attempt to paraphrase.
“Say you come up with an idea that involves rain. At a glance, the fact that a guy sitting nearby mentioned a ham sandwich 15 minutes beforehand may seem totally irrelevant. But who’s to say that your mind didn’t go from ham to pig, pig to mud, mud to water, water to rain? The human mind works in weird ways, so maybe the guy that said ham sandwich should get some credit for the rain idea.”
Now crediting ham sandwich guy may be a bit extreme, but it makes a point. Integrated campaigns can extend over mass, OOH, digital, social, mobile, and experiential realms. The full complement of teams is therefore huge, and the gamut of input clearly varied. The standard credit list of account and creative leads rarely include members of the QA team. If, however, you were to remove a single person from the equation, there’s a possibility that the output wouldn’t have been the same.
Personally, I think the credit list forms for award shows and trade magazines/websites should be extended to reflect this new reality. Thoughts?