Strategy Food for thought: The spy who sold out

Thanks to a massive product integration deal in the latest [...]

read
Design Forgiving a pretty face

In the late spirit of Valentine’s day, I’ve been thinking [...]

read
Digital Facebook to agencies: how will people share your story?

As Facebook aims to go public on May 17 2012, [...]

read
Culture Is “The Pitch” an accurate reflection of our industry? read

Big Orange Slide

Wednesday, May 23rd, 2012

Rage, rage against the dying of the darkroom

June 14, 2011 by Warren Haas

Illustration by Nancy Ng

As we’re reminded pretty much every second of the day, we live in a digital world. So much so that I feel pretty ridiculous even writing that. And yet there are still some people out there who are trying to either hang onto or revive pieces of our analog past.

Take the photography industry for example. Digital cameras have been around since the ‘80s and have reached a point where they have almost completely replaced the film camera. But there are film purists out there (including some professional photographers) who refuse to make the transition to digital, even if it vastly reduces their costs.

While there is a minority still willing to pay for film as production of it declines and the cost of developing goes up, does that mean it’s a smart move to start a company that relies solely on selling analog product?

Shortly after Polaroid discontinued the production of their film, The Impossible Project was launched in an attempt to keep the evaporating instant-film market alive. Staffed with former Polaroid employees, the company caters to a very niche market of photographers who are willing to pay $30 for 8 shots of film and hundreds of dollars for vintage Polaroid camera equipment.

So far, the project has lasted nearly three years. But does that mean they’re successful or merely hanging on by a thread? Can they survive in a world where consumers can buy digital cameras that cost only slightly more than a pack of instant film?

They aren’t alone in selling analog photo equipment. Hipsters and photo enthusiasts may have noticed the relatively new chain of Lomography stores for people who like playing around with cheap, purposely-flawed film cameras. But those stores also offer products for people who use digital cameras, just as Polaroid has tailored its offerings to almost exclusively digital products. I say almost because they have recently re-introduced one instant-film camera model for their analog niche.

So what does this all mean for what’s left of the film industry? Can it even be said that such an industry still exists? Are film cameras destined to be mantelpiece decorations? Or will there always be small number of film photographers able to keep this small but dedicated market afloat?

Maybe only time will tell for analog enthusiasts like myself. That being said, I didn’t type this on an Underwood.

Big Orange Banter – Volume 2

June 13, 2011 by Big Orange Slide

A couple weeks ago we offered you a quick back and forth between Tali Krakowsky and Jason Theodor as part of our video series from FITC 2011. This week, treat yourself to a few energetic minutes with Robert Hodgin (co-founder of the Barbarian Group currently the Creative Director at Bloom Studio) and Erik Natzke (an interaction designer blurring the lines between design and technology).

Brand new friends

June 9, 2011 by Trevor Gourley

Illustration by Brian Ross

You just got a message on Facebook! It’s about the awesome weekend that lies ahead of you. The sender of that message also liked your profile pic – probably because they’re tagged in it. You post on their wall all the time, and they hit you back. You are consummate Facebook pals. Except for one minor detail – this person isn’t a person. It’s a brand.

First you could become a fan of them on Facebook. Now you can comment on their walls – and they can comment on yours. You can exchange likes, messages and shares. You can attend their events. The kicker came recently, with the ability for consumers to tag brands in their photos. While this development might seem inconsequential some, for advertisers it’s a major step forwards in uniting people with positive brand experiences. Which is what we’re all trying to do here, right?

Snapshot of an awesome night out courtesy of Budweiser? Tag ‘em. Awestruck fiancée gawking at her DeBeers ring? Tag ‘em. Brands have been given another opportunity to go from passive onlookers to active participants in the consumer experience.

If you can create (or maintain) a healthy brand relationship, people will begin to tag your brand in their photos – maybe they are photos of them using the product but maybe it’s them holding Widget X and giving a thumbs up – which are then displayed on the brand’s page. Consumers actively associating themselves with the brand and advertising their love of the product.

What’s next for brands on Facebook?

The Gaga gambit

June 8, 2011 by Sean Mayers

Illustration by Julia Morra

While you may not like how much of your paycheque goes towards that pricey latte habit, you gotta hand it to Starbucks. They continue to push the mega-brand visionary gambit by embracing the very communication channels that their customers use in their daily lives. Of course, you’re pretty much bound to succeed when one such gambit involves the world’s greatest self-promoter and most followed person on Twitter, the one and only Lady Gaga.
In one of those “I guess it makes sense but… really?” type partnerships, Starbucks has teamed up with Lady Gaga to create SRCH by Starbucks, a digital scavenger hunt. Consumers could participate by scanning a QR code posted at participating Starbucks locations throughout the US. Once in the game, participants searched for clues across digital properties and could solve puzzles for a chance to win Starbucks and Lady Gaga themed prizes. An experiential grand prize was offered to the first person to complete the final round of the scavenger hunt. In addition, all Starbucks locations offered consumers a special edition of Lady Gaga’s new CD “Born this Way” and enabled streaming of the entire album from the in-store Starbucks Digital Network.

Starbucks has already made several popular forays into the digital space, allowing consumers to become collaborators in shaping Starbucks’s strategy and innovation. In a way, this initiative is another step in creating closer connections between the retail environment and Starbucks’ online content network.

What do you think? Does this feel like a logical evolution of the Starbucks brand?


The view from here

June 7, 2011 by Daniel Gerichter

Illustration by Brian Ross

Apple runs this town.

Want to know how I know? Well, let’s create a hypothetical situation.

Imagine HP decided to have one of their facilities blocked from Google Earth for months. Now, imagine they decided to unblock it. A tree falls in the forest…

Apple, however, has a slightly different submission hold on public attention. If Apple were to pull the same stunt, it would be a newsworthy event, as demonstrated by Apple’s announcement on June 1st that they decided to unblock Google Earth’s view of their $1 billion dollar North Carolina data centre. The move, incidentally, coincided with the hotly-anticipated iCloud service that was unveiled yesterday.

This announcement comes at a time when companies are finding themselves in the infancy stage of using satellite imaging as an all-new medium. 

Maxim Magazine (or as I like to call it Diet Playboy) created a mammoth, 75 X 110 foot replica of their 100th issue in the Las Vegas desert. Eva Longoria was literally visible from Space.

KFC constructed an 87,000 foot logo near Area 51, also visible from Google Earth.

Target took the time to put their iconic logo on various store rooftops, making them visible from Google Earth.

This imaging is viewable by everyone, long-term and most importantly, with no ongoing media spend.

People still get a kick out of seeing their world on Google Earth, while others enjoy screwing with Streetview. Geography has appeared as a relatively untapped bastion of creative placement. If the point of branding is to latch onto our hearts and minds, then it stands to reason that people would dig the shock and awe of unfeasibly oversized brand messaging. Or, in Apple’s case, revelations.

I believe there’s something deeper at play here. For my own part, I relish those moments when I can look up at the stars to ruminate about my place in the universe. I wonder if there’s a psychological thrill in being reminded of how minute we are. Of being reminded about all those places on the earth we are unaware of. At least, until Google removes the tarp from the logo.

Adception

June 3, 2011 by Trevor Gourley

Illustration by Brian Ross

I’m 6 years old and it’s 6 a.m. on a bone-chilling February morning. The sun’s not up yet. I’m fully dressed in my hockey gear (save for my skates) in addition to my winter jacket. I wait for my dad to trudge out of the house. The heater hasn’t kicked in, and my breath hangs in the air. I’m tired, I’m cold, and I don’t want to be here. Suddenly, the car is illuminated with the warming red glow of a Tim Horton’s sign. My dad buys me a hot chocolate and orders himself a regular coffee, and suddenly this chilly Canadian morning is bearable and wholesome again.

This story is bullshit. I remember it like it was yesterday, but it didn’t happen. How do I know? Because my podunk one-stoplight town didn’t have a Tim Horton’s until I was 15. Despite this, that memory is visceral. If it weren’t for its factual impossibility, I would be adamant it had happened. Why? Because Tim Horton’s has been churning out feel good, aw shucks Canadiana advertising since before I was born, and I’ve absorbed every bit of it.

This is the subject of a new article from The Journal of Consumer Experience titled “I Imagine I Experience, I Like: The False Experience Effect.” The study suggests that commercials, especially ones that deal with childhood and nostalgia, appeal to the same part of the brain that creates genuine memories. As the abstract explains, these invented brand memories “function akin to genuine product experiences”. This means that whether you actually experienced hot summer days running through the sprinkler while drinking Kool-Aid® or you just think you did – the brand’s value is the same to you.

Do you subscribe to the notion that advertising can be this powerful? Do you have any childhood memories that get drawn into question with developments like these?

Group discount or dupe discount?

June 2, 2011 by Daniel Gerichter

Illustration by Julia Morra

Picture it – November, 2010. Toronto.

As I looked for holiday gifts, TeamSave (a group discount site) offered the Blossom Package at Chakra Spa – A thorough spa experience, where the lucky patron is gently attacked with all manner of fruit. This results in relaxation. Simple enough.

I purchased the package, believing my girlfriend would love it. She certainly loved the notion of it, but that’s about as far as it got.

Two weeks after receiving the gift, she called Chakra and was informed that they were undergoing renovations. They insisted they’d be back ASAP, at which point they’d honour any coupons or packages. A month passed. Same message. After three months, their sign no longer appeared above their door, and their answering machine was too overloaded to accept any new messages. We’d been duped.

My anger at the situation was reflected in two emails I sent to both TeamSave and Chakra. The latter has yet to be answered, while the former was addressed, refunded and apology issued within 48 hours.

From this experience, I can say that I have no beef with group discount sites. They’re far more accountable than some of the businesses they represent.

From an advertising standpoint, sites like Groupon, WagJag et al offer a great opportunity to local businesses. The model works on the notion that the loss in immediate revenue is small compared to the wide-reaching promotion they receive. Therefore, a restaurant offering $60 of food for $20 gets a sudden surge of business from people who a) want to try new dining experiences and b) are taking advantage of a deal.

At that point, the ability to turn that promotion into recurring business is in their hands. Take note, local businesses owners. Here comes the market research.

As a purchaser of a group discount, I expect the following:

• That my purchased product/service will be rendered within a reasonable time of my redeeming it.

• That said product/service will be honoured without the stipend of buying more at the “regular rate.”

• That the business allows me to enjoy their product/service without being immediately up-sold.

• That the business actually exists.

It’s not rocket surgery. My positive experience in your establishment will quite likely make for a repeat visit in the future. Being treated like a nuisance reminds me of why I was never a customer to begin with.

The trouble is, when redemption goes bad, it really goes bad. Those who may have seen the $99 for $400 worth of organic meat deal from The Butchers in Toronto has likely also heard the uproar around their previous deals. This particular establishment has developed an unfortunate reputation for running afowl of the quality of their offering and the hurdles coupon holders have had to jump through to claim their product. At last check, The Butchers has heavily regulated the hours in which they will honour coupons, and has even gone so far as to enlist police officers to ensure their staff are not “verbally or physically assaulted.”

Upon reaching out to my contemporaries, I was provided a wealth of unique (but similar) stories. These are the words of real people who may or may not be in the witness relocation program.

AS writes:

“I bought a Groupon for VIKASPA in Yorkville. When I called to redeem two weeks later, they had no available appointments…for three months. Five months later still not able to redeem. Oh, and they’ve had three offers since I’ve purchased. My feeling as a consumer? No one is regulating these companies, so really, the company is just receiving money from me, not providing the service and soliciting more offers to keep the scam going. Not sure it’s truly the case, but it’s messed. I’ll never buy a Groupon again.”

LA recalls:

“My friend and I bought WagJags for a “no strings attached” trial run at Extreme Fitness that “included” personal consultation and training sessions. After a preemptive tour of the facilities, we were lead back into the membership room, whereupon the hard sell began.

I told them that we were in advertising, knew that the assessment was a trainer upsell, and that we were only interested in taking advantage of the equipment. Their response? That “an assessment and training was mandatory within 10 days of redeeming our WagJags, but could be waived if we signed up for the year long membership  – which was only available if we signed up, more or less, on the spot.”

We left and were determined to call our $24 a loss. WagJag was incredibly responsive, but I’ve been actively denigrating Extreme Fitness every since.”

LA2 notes:

“I purchased a spa gift certificate only to show up to a deserted parking lot. The woman at the office next door said that in fact the address provided to me was a wood shop. After calling the ’spa owner’ repeatedly I was told that the spa had flooded and all appointments were cancelled. Needless to say, I got my money back. I’ve had some great experiences with Groupon, however, so I’m still a fan of the online discount trend.”

JD weeps:

“My friend purchased a Groupon for a meal pack from a local Panago. So, he went down to pick up his deal, however they charged him the HST. He didn’t have any cash/credit on him. The cashier was very impatient and got frustrated that my friend had a Groupon receipt. My friend mentioned that he’d paid the HST and it was included in the Groupon. The cashier argued with him, and when they weren’t able to come to a resolution the cashier threw my friend’s combo into the garbage in front of him.”

SV noms:

“I got a box of free Krispy Kreme donuts. True story.”

In most cases the discount sites are not to blame for the shady dealings of the companies they represent. Customers will get their money back from the discount site itself, forcing them to take a loss for behavior beyond their control. For many, the image of these sites is inextricably linked to being screwed by the deal. The end result could be that the opportunity to try new things on the cheap is sullied by greed, opportunism and bad business sense.

Google has recently launched a beta version of its own discount site in four cities. Will they allow local businesses to run roughshod over unsuspecting customers, at the cost of their own corporate image?

More importantly, will Chakra Spa return from its six month slumber? Inquiring minds want a mangosteen/passion fruit exfoliation.

Best of May

June 1, 2011 by Big Orange Slide

Illustration by Haley Fiege

The Grip offices were solidly subjected to the soak of Spring for most of May. Luckily, there was a similar deluge of bloody good blog posts.

Ad advice – by Big Orange Slide
A compendium of some of the best pieces of advice Grippers have received in their careers.

Just because your client bought it doesn’t mean it’s good – by Ian Mackenzie
A caution against allowing your work to wander towards “good enough.” Good enough is the cost of entry in this business. Great careers were never built on that principle.

How all brands can leverage social media, and why they should – by Jacoub Bondre
The days of the mom and pop shop may be challenged, but the lessons learned from their particular business acumen are not. Jacoub’s advice to big brands using social media? Get personal and get real.

So long, long copy? – by Trevor Gourley
People maintain that “no one reads the copy.” However, when your idea is resonant and your artfulness is obvious, people will not only read it – they will love you for it.

Big Orange Banter: Volume 1 – a joint production between Grip Limited and FITC
The first in a series of lighthearted interviews with some of 2011’s best presenters at FITC Toronto.

Comment of the Month:

“Show and tell for your thoughts.”

In response to: Q+A: How would you describe social media to your grandmother (in 10 words or less)